0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo E8600 vs AMD A8 3870K |
Released July, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo E8600
- 3.33 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo E8600
![]() | Higher clock speed 3.33 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.61 GHz |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.6 GHz | ![]() | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 113.62 $/year |
VS
Released December, 2011
AMD A8 3870K
- 3 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the AMD A8 3870K
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm |
![]() | More cores 4 | ![]() | More threads 4 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 3.33 GHz | vs | 3 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.61 GHz | vs | 3.56 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.6 GHz | vs | 3.67 GHz | More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 113.62 $/year | vs | 138.41 $/year | Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 40.03 $/year | vs | 47.3 $/year | More than 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Newer | Dec, 2011 | vs | Jul, 2008 | Release date over 3 years later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo E8600 vs A8 3870K
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E8600
3,344
A8 3870K
5,602
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E8600
1,844
A8 3870K
1,597
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E8600
136,900 MB/s
A8 3870K
126,200 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E8600
3,168
A8 3870K
5,339
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E8600
3,535
A8 3870K
7,554
GeekBench
Core2 Duo E8600
5,492
A8 3870K
7,554
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo E8600
2,415
A8 3870K
3,596
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo E8600
1,373
A8 3870K
1,032
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo E8600 | vs | A8 3870K |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 3 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
FM1 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
AMD-V | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 100W | |
Annual home energy cost | 47.3 $/year | 40.03 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 113.62 $/year | 138.41 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.1 pt/W | 1.03 pt/W | |
Idle power consumption | 93.5W | 47W | |
Peak power consumption | 129.7W | 158W | |
Typical power consumption | 120.65W | N/A |
details | Core2 Duo E8600 | vs | A8 3870K |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 4 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 32 nm | |
Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 1,178,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 10 | 30 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.45 - 1.41V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.4°C | Unknown - 72.7°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 9 | 32 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 4.61 GHz | 3.56 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.6 GHz | 3.67 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.61 GHz | 3.56 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Radeon™ HD 6550D | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.0 | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 600 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 600 MHz | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 4 | |
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 100 MHz |
Intel Core2 Duo E8600 ![]() | AMD A8 3870K ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $285 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs E8600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $285 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs E8600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$339 | $285 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 vs Duo E8600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$285 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Duo E8600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | $285 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Duo E8600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $285 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 vs Duo E8600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $285 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs E8600 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||