0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs AMD Athlon II X3 450 |
Released January, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo E8500
- 3.16 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo E8500
![]() | Much more l2 cache 6 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core |
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year |
VS
Released September, 2010
AMD Athlon II X3 450
- 3.2 GHz
- Tri core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon II X3 450
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 2.13 pt/$ | ![]() | Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,354 |
![]() | Newer Sep, 2010 | ![]() | More cores 3 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | AMD Athlon II X3 450CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 6 MB | vs | 1.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 6x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 113.2W | 2.1x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 39.59 $/year | 2.5x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.46 GHz | vs | 3.86 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,318 | vs | 1,058 | Around 25% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 113.44 $/year | Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.42 GHz | vs | 3.1 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Better performance per watt | 1.93 pt/W | vs | 1.07 pt/W | More than 80% better performance per watt | |||
| |||||||
Much better performance per dollar | 2.13 pt/$ | vs | 0.63 pt/$ | Around 3.5x better performance per dollar | |||
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 4,354 | vs | 3,230 | Around 35% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Newer | Sep, 2010 | vs | Jan, 2008 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
More cores | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more cores; run more applications at once |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo E8500 vs Athlon II X3 450
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E8500
3,230
Athlon II X3 450
4,354
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E8500
1,773
Athlon II X3 450
1,632
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E8500
129,700 MB/s
Athlon II X3 450
128,950 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E8500
2,970
Athlon II X3 450
4,231
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E8500
3,088
Athlon II X3 450
6,308
GeekBench
Core2 Duo E8500
5,261
Athlon II X3 450
6,308
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo E8500
2,291
Athlon II X3 450
2,626
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo E8500
1,318
Athlon II X3 450
1,058
Reviews Word on the street
Core2 Duo E8500 | vs | Athlon II X3 450 | ||
![]() | 8.0 | 8.0 |
---|
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo E8500 | vs | Athlon II X3 450 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.16 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Tri core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
AM3 | |||
Super 7 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 39.59 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 113.44 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.93 pt/W | 1.07 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 113.2W | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 100 MHz |
details | Core2 Duo E8500 | vs | Athlon II X3 450 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 3 | |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 1.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.85 - 1.4V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.4°C | Unknown - 75°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 33 | 16 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 4.46 GHz | 3.86 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.42 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.46 GHz | 3.86 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 ![]() | AMD Athlon II X3 450 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $179 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs Quad Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $285 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs E8600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $125 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs E7500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $287 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs Quad Q9550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $125 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $179 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs Quad Q8400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||