0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs AMD Athlon 4 900 |
Released January, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo E8500
- 3.16 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo E8500
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Much more l2 cache 6 MB |
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.16 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.46 GHz |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 180 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache | 6 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 12x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much higher clock speed | 3.16 GHz | vs | 0.9 GHz | More than 3.5x higher clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.46 GHz | vs | 1.32 GHz | More than 3.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many threads | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 6x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.42 GHz | vs | 0.9 GHz | Around 5x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon 4 900 vs the Intel Core2 Duo E8500. | |||||||
Features Key features of the Core2 Duo E8500 vs Athlon 4 900
clock speed
Core2 Duo E8500
3.16 GHz
Athlon 4 900
0.9 GHz
L2 cache
Core2 Duo E8500
6 MB
Athlon 4 900
0.5 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Core2 Duo E8500
4.46 GHz
Athlon 4 900
1.32 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Core2 Duo E8500
4.42 GHz
Athlon 4 900
0.9 GHz
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo E8500 | vs | Athlon 4 900 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.16 GHz | 0.9 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
462 | |||
Slot A | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 200 MHz |
details | Core2 Duo E8500 | vs | Athlon 4 900 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 180 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.46 GHz | 1.32 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.42 GHz | 0.9 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.46 GHz | 1.32 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | N/A |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 ![]() | AMD Athlon 4 900 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs Quad Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $179 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $287 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs Quad Q9550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $125 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $285 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs E8600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $179 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs Quad Q8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $125 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs E7500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||