Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs E7500 |
Released January, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo E8400
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo E8400
 | Much more l2 cache 6 MB | | Supports trusted computing Yes |
| | Significantly better PassMark score 2,172 | | Significantly better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score 3,647 |
by Anthony-Garreffa (Sep, 2012)Your GPU setup is more than good enough to run Battlefield 3 at medium-to-high settings at 1920x1080, so I would suggest waiting and upgrading to an Ivy Bridge setup.
VS
Released January, 2009
Intel Core2 Duo E7500
- 2.93 GHz
- Dual core
4.9 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the E7500
| | Newer Jan, 2009 | | Higher Maximum operating temperature 74.1 °C |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E8400 vs E7500 among desktop CPUs (45 to 75W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Fire Strike | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core2 Duo E8400CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 6 MB | vs | 3 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 2,172 | vs | 1,883 | More than 15% better PassMark score | |||
| Significantly better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score | 3,647 | vs | 3,576 | Almost the same | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.23 GHz | vs | 3.83 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,257 | vs | 1,206 | Around 5% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better cinebench r10 32Bit score | 7,187 | vs | 6,903 | Around 5% better cinebench r10 32Bit score | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.21 GHz | vs | 3.98 GHz | More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Newer | Jan, 2009 | vs | Jan, 2008 | Release date a year later | |||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 74.1 °C | vs | 72.4 °C | Almost the same | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo E8400 vs E7500
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo E8400 | vs | E7500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.93 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.11 pt/W | 2.18 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 1,066 MHz | |
details | Core2 Duo E8400 | vs | E7500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 3 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
| Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 228,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 9 | 11 | |
| Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.85 - 1.36V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.4°C | Unknown - 74.1°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.23 GHz | 3.83 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.21 GHz | 3.98 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.23 GHz | 3.83 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Core2 Duo E8400  Report a correction |  Intel Core2 Duo E7500 Report a correction |
Desktops
Looking for a desktop?
- 2 desktops with the Intel Core2 Duo E8400, starting from $100
- 2 desktops with the Intel Core2 Duo E7500, starting from $100
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $11 | $118 | |
| E8400 vs Q6600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $11 | $238 | |
| E8400 vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $11 | $118 | |
| E8400 vs Q8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $11 | $1,645 | |
| E8400 vs Q9650 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $11 | $196 | |
| E8400 vs E8500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $11 | $190 | |
| E8400 vs Q9400 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $0 | $93 | |
| E7500 vs E5700 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $393 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS | |
| $227 | $393 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 5200U vs 7410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $666 | $747 | |
| 6200U vs 6500U | ||
| | VS | |
| $281 | $666 | |
| 5200U vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | $161 | |
| 5200U vs N3700 | ||
