0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Celeron E3200 |
Released January, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo E8400
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo E8400
![]() | Much more l2 cache 6 MB | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 3 GHz |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.22 GHz |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 6 MB | vs | 1 MB | 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 6x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.22 GHz | vs | 3.82 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron E3200 vs the Core2 Duo E8400. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo E8400 vs Celeron E3200
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E8400
2,982
Celeron E3200
2,394
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E8400
1,625
Celeron E3200
1,326
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E8400
128,000 MB/s
Celeron E3200
109,650 MB/s
3D Mark 11 (Physics)
Core2 Duo E8400
2,310
Celeron E3200
1,240
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo E8400 | vs | Celeron E3200 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 800 MHz |
details | Core2 Duo E8400 | vs | Celeron E3200 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.22 GHz | 3.82 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.23 GHz | 4.2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.22 GHz | 3.82 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.83 pt/W | 1.8 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 52.81W |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 ![]() | Intel Celeron E3200 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Duo E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $179 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Core2 Duo E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $179 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $179 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 vs Duo E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $179 | |
Intel Pentium E5700 vs Core2 Duo E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $179 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$339 | $179 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 vs Duo E8400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||