Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Celeron 2000E

Intel Celeron 2000E

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo E8400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo E8400

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz More than 35% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.22 GHz vs 2.2 GHz More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.23 GHz vs 2.2 GHz More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron 2000E

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 2000E

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better performance per dollar 1.42 pt/$ vs 0.67 pt/$ Around 2.2x better performance per dollar
Significantly lower typical power consumption 30.06W vs 52.81W Around 45% lower typical power consumption
Newer Jan, 2014 vs Jan, 2008 Release date over 6 years later
Better performance per watt 3.3 pt/W vs 1.83 pt/W More than 80% better performance per watt
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 8.91 $/year vs 15.66 $/year Around 45% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 32.41 $/year vs 56.94 $/year Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo E8400 vs Celeron 2000E

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo E8400  vs
Celeron 2000E 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 37W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 8.91 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 32.41 $/year
Performance per watt 1.83 pt/W 3.3 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 30.06W

details

Core2 Duo E8400  vs
Celeron 2000E 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
Manufacture process 45 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.22 GHz 2.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.23 GHz 2.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.22 GHz 2.2 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 400 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 900 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 0
Intel Core2 Duo E8400
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 2000E
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus