Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo E8400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo E8400

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 6 MB vs 2 MB 3x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz More than 35% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 6x more l2 cache per core
Front view of AMD A8 for AIOs 6410

Reasons to consider the
AMD A8 for AIOs 6410

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 52.81W 4.3x lower typical power consumption
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 72.4 °C Around 25% higher Maximum operating temperature
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 4.3x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 4.3x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo E8400 vs A8 for AIOs 6410

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo E8400  vs
A8 for AIOs 6410 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA4
Supplemental SSE3
AES

details

Core2 Duo E8400  vs
A8 for AIOs 6410 
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 6 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 28 nm
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.4°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ R5
Latest DirectX N/A 12.0
GPU clock speed N/A 847 MHz

power consumption

TDP 65W 15W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 13.14 $/year
Typical power consumption 52.81W 12.19W
Intel Core2 Duo E8400
Report a correction
AMD A8 for AIOs 6410
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus