0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo E8300 vs AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600 |
Released April, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo E8300
- 2.83 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo E8300
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core |
VS
First seen on April, 2017
AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600
- 3.2 GHz
- Hexa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.2 GHz |
![]() | More cores 6 | ![]() | More threads 12 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 6x more l2 cache per core | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.83 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
More cores | 6 | vs | 2 | Three times as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 12 | vs | 2 | 10 more threads |
Features Key features of the Core2 Duo E8300 vs Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600
clock speed
Core2 Duo E8300
2.83 GHz
Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600
3.2 GHz
L2 cache
Core2 Duo E8300
6 MB
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo E8300 | vs | Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Hexa core | |
features | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA3 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 |
details | Core2 Duo E8300 | vs | Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 12 | |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 3 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 14 nm | |
power consumption | |||
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | N/A |
Intel Core2 Duo E8300 ![]() | AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs Ryzen™ 5 1600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$128 | ||
8350 vs Ryzen™ 5 1600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
6700K vs Ryzen™ 5 1600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | ||
3770 vs Ryzen™ 5 1600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | ||
6300 vs Ryzen™ 5 1600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | ||
6600K vs Ryzen™ 5 1600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
Ryzen™ 5 1600X vs Ryzen™ 5 1600 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||