CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E7500 vs 4670K among desktop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i5 4670K 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 4670K  based on its performance, single-core performance and overclocking.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i5 4670K

Intel Core i5 4670K

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo E7500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo E7500

Report a correction
More l2 cache 3 MB vs 1 MB 3x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 6x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 68.25W Around 25% lower typical power consumption
Higher Maximum operating temperature 74.1 °C vs 72.72 °C Almost the same
Lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 20.24 $/year Around 25% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 73.58 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i5 4670K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 4670K

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2.93 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 2,203 vs 1,206 Around 85% better PassMark (Single core) score
Newer Apr, 2013 vs Jan, 2009 Release date over 4 years later
Significantly better PassMark score 7,665 vs 1,883 More than 4x better PassMark score
Much better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score 7,335 vs 3,576 More than 2x better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score
Better geekbench 2 (64-bit) score 12,725 vs 2,986 More than 4.2x better geekbench 2 (64-bit) score
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Significantly better performance per watt 11.9 pt/W vs 2.25 pt/W More than 5.2x better performance per watt
Significantly better cinebench r10 32Bit score 25,519 vs 6,903 Around 3.8x better cinebench r10 32Bit score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.48 GHz vs 3.83 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.56 GHz vs 3.94 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo E7500 vs Core i5 4670K

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core2 Duo E7500
124,700 MB/s
Core i5 4670K
4,930,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

Cinebench R10 32-Bit (Single Core)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo E7500  vs
Core i5 4670K 
Clock speed 2.93 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 84W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 20.24 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 73.58 $/year
Performance per watt 2.25 pt/W 11.9 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 68.25W

details

Core2 Duo E7500  vs
Core i5 4670K 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 3 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 74.1°C Unknown - 72.72°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.83 GHz 4.48 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.94 GHz 4.56 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.83 GHz 4.48 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4600
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,200 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 0
Intel Core2 Duo E7500
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 4670K
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
i own both these Cpues 4670k is 399% faster than e7500 it means almost x4 time faster than e7500.Eg if you get 5fps on video encoding on e7500 then will you will get 19fps on 4670k
comments powered by Disqus