0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs Celeron E1200 |
Released January, 2009
Intel Core2 Duo E7500
- 2.93 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo E7500
![]() | Much more l2 cache 3 MB | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.93 GHz |
![]() | Much better PassMark score 1,877 | ![]() | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,204 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 3 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher clock speed | 2.93 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 85% higher clock speed | |||
Much better PassMark score | 1,877 | vs | 861 | Around 2.2x better PassMark score | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,204 | vs | 578 | More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 2,673 | vs | 1,371 | Around 95% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better performance per watt | 1.9 pt/W | vs | 0.78 pt/W | Around 2.5x better performance per watt | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 6x more l2 cache per core | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.85 GHz | vs | 3.16 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.06 GHz | vs | 2.69 GHz | More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 74.1 °C | vs | 73.3 °C | Almost the same | |||
Newer | Jan, 2009 | vs | Jan, 2008 | Release date a year later | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron E1200 vs the Core2 Duo E7500. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo E7500 vs Celeron E1200
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E7500
2,850
Celeron E1200
2,159
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E7500
1,553
Celeron E1200
1,237
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E7500
124,700 MB/s
Celeron E1200
127.7 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E7500
2,673
Celeron E1200
1,371
GeekBench
Core2 Duo E7500
4,879
Celeron E1200
1,780
Cinebench R10 32-Bit
Core2 Duo E7500
6,903
Celeron E1200
2,980
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo E7500
1,877
Celeron E1200
861
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo E7500
1,204
Celeron E1200
578
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo E7500 | vs | Celeron E1200 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.93 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.9 pt/W | 0.78 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,066 MHz | 800 MHz |
details | Core2 Duo E7500 | vs | Celeron E1200 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 3 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 228,000,000 | 105,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 11 | 8 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.85 - 1.5V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 74.1°C | Unknown - 73.3°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.85 GHz | 3.16 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.06 GHz | 2.69 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.85 GHz | 3.16 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Duo E7500 ![]() | Intel Celeron E1200 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $125 | |
E8400 vs E7500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $125 | |
E5700 vs E7500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
Q6600 vs E7500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $125 | |
3220 vs E7500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
260 vs E7500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $125 | |
E5800 vs E7500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $125 | |
E8500 vs E7500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||