Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs AMD Athlon Athlon™ 5350 |
Released January, 2009
Intel Core2 Duo E7500
- 2.93 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo E7500
 | Much higher clock speed 2.93 GHz | | Much more l2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core |
VS
First seen on March, 2016
AMD Athlon Athlon™ 5350
- 2.05 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon Athlon™ 5350
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm |
| | More cores 4 | | More threads 4 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 2.93 GHz | vs | 2.05 GHz | Around 45% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 3x more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 28 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 20.31W | vs | 52.81W | 2.6x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 76 °C | vs | 74.1 °C | Around 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | 2.6x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 21.9 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | 2.6x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Core2 Duo E7500 vs Athlon Athlon™ 5350
clock speed
L2 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo E7500 | vs | Athlon Athlon™ 5350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.93 GHz | 2.05 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
details | Core2 Duo E7500 | vs | Athlon Athlon™ 5350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 28 nm | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 74.1°C | Unknown - 76°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Radeon™ R3 | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | 12.0 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 600 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 25W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 6.02 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 21.9 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 20.31W | |
 Intel Core2 Duo E7500  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon Athlon™ 5350 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $179 | |
| E7500 vs E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $64 | |
| E7500 vs E5700 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | ||
| E7500 vs Q6600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $125 | |
| E7500 vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | ||
| E7500 vs 260 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $67 | |
| E7500 vs E5400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | ||
| E7500 vs 250 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5300 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
