0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs AMD Athlon Athlon™ 5350 |
Released January, 2009
Intel Core2 Duo E7500
- 2.93 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo E7500
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.93 GHz | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core |
VS
First seen on March, 2016
AMD Athlon Athlon™ 5350
- 2.05 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon Athlon™ 5350
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm |
![]() | More cores 4 | ![]() | More threads 4 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.93 GHz | vs | 2.05 GHz | Around 45% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 3x more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 28 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 20.31W | vs | 52.81W | 2.6x lower typical power consumption | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 76 °C | vs | 74.1 °C | Around 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | 2.6x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 21.9 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | 2.6x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Core2 Duo E7500 vs Athlon Athlon™ 5350
clock speed
Core2 Duo E7500
2.93 GHz
Athlon Athlon™ 5350
2.05 GHz
L2 cache
Core2 Duo E7500
3 MB
Athlon Athlon™ 5350
2 MB
TDP
Core2 Duo E7500
65W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo E7500 | vs | Athlon Athlon™ 5350 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.93 GHz | 2.05 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA4 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES |
details | Core2 Duo E7500 | vs | Athlon Athlon™ 5350 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 28 nm | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 74.1°C | Unknown - 76°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Radeon™ R3 | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | 12.0 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 600 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 25W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 6.02 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 21.9 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 20.31W |
Intel Core2 Duo E7500 ![]() | AMD Athlon Athlon™ 5350 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $145 | |
E7500 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $64 | |
E7500 vs E5700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
E7500 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $125 | |
E7500 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
E7500 vs 260 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $72 | |
E7500 vs E5800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $179 | |
E7500 vs Q8400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
3220 vs 5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||