Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Atom Z2760

Intel Atom Z2760

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo E7200

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo E7200

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 108,000 MB/s vs 28,500 MB/s More than 3.8x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much more l2 cache 3 MB vs 1 MB 3x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,324 vs 1,041 Around 2.2x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Significantly higher clock speed 2.53 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much more l2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 3x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.84 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Slightly better PassMark score 1,635 vs 571 More than 2.8x better PassMark score
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.53 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom Z2760

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z2760

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 1.63W vs 52.81W 32.5x lower typical power consumption
Much better performance per watt 16.38 pt/W vs 1.28 pt/W More than 12.8x better performance per watt
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Apr, 2008 Release date over 4 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 0.48 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 32.5x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 1.75 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 32.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better performance per dollar 0.8 pt/$ vs 0.71 pt/$ More than 10% better performance per dollar

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo E7200 vs Atom Z2760

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core2 Duo E7200
108,000 MB/s
Atom Z2760
28,500 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo E7200  vs
Atom Z2760 
Clock speed 2.53 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 2W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 0.48 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 1.75 $/year
Performance per watt 1.28 pt/W 16.38 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 1.63W

details

Core2 Duo E7200  vs
Atom Z2760 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 3 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.84 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.53 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.84 GHz 1.8 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Integrated
GPU clock speed N/A 533 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core2 Duo E7200
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z2760
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus