0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo E7200 vs AMD Athlon X2 4400+ |
Released April, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo E7200
- 2.53 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo E7200
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2.53 GHz |
![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 74.1 °C | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 2.53 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 74.1 °C | vs | 55 °C | Around 35% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 72.31W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 21.44 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 77.96 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon X2 4400+ vs the Intel Core2 Duo E7200. | |||||||
Features Key features of the Core2 Duo E7200 vs Athlon X2 4400+
clock speed
Core2 Duo E7200
2.53 GHz
Athlon X2 4400+
2.2 GHz
L2 cache
Core2 Duo E7200
3 MB
Athlon X2 4400+
2 MB
TDP
Core2 Duo E7200
65W
Athlon X2 4400+
89W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo E7200 | vs | Athlon X2 4400+ |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
AM2 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 89W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 21.44 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 77.96 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 72.31W |
details | Core2 Duo E7200 | vs | Athlon X2 4400+ |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 90 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 74.1°C | Unknown - 55°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Duo E7200 ![]() | AMD Athlon X2 4400+ ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $117 | |
E8400 vs E7200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$117 | ||
Q6600 vs E7200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $117 | |
E5200 vs E7200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $117 | |
E5700 vs E7200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$67 | $117 | |
E5400 vs E7200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$41 | $117 | |
Z2760 vs E7200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$187 | $117 | |
E6750 vs E7200 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||