CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E6750 vs J1900 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core2 Duo E6750 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core2 Duo E6750  based on its single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo E6750

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo E6750

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 113,500 MB/s vs 56,900 MB/s Around 2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2.66 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.67 GHz vs 2.42 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.72 GHz vs 2.42 GHz Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Better performance per dollar 0.59 pt/$ vs 0.52 pt/$ Around 15% better performance per dollar
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 52.81W 6.5x lower typical power consumption
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Jul, 2007 Release date over 6 years later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better performance per watt 4.28 pt/W vs 1.7 pt/W More than 2.5x better performance per watt
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 6.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 6.5x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo E6750 vs Celeron J1900

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core2 Duo E6750
113,500 MB/s
Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo E6750  vs
Celeron J1900 
Clock speed 2.66 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 688 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 854 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core2 Duo E6750  vs
Celeron J1900 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 4 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.67 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.72 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.67 GHz 2.42 GHz

power consumption

TDP 65W 10W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 1.7 pt/W 4.28 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 8.13W
Intel Core2 Duo E6750
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus