0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo E6700 vs E6600 |
Released July, 2006
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
- 2.66 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo E6700
![]() | Higher clock speed 2.66 GHz | ![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.6 GHz |
VS
Released July, 2006
Intel Core2 Duo E6600
- 2.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the E6600
![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.49 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 2.66 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.6 GHz | vs | 3.45 GHz | Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.49 GHz | vs | 3.35 GHz | Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo E6700 vs E6600
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E6700
2,556
Core2 Duo E6600
2,322
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E6700
1,390
Core2 Duo E6600
1,276
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E6700
113,800 MB/s
Core2 Duo E6600
102,200 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E6700
2,396
Core2 Duo E6600
2,163
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E6700
3,863
Core2 Duo E6600
2,409
GeekBench
Core2 Duo E6700
3,863
Core2 Duo E6600
4,006
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo E6700
1,703
Core2 Duo E6600
1,884
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo E6700
995
Core2 Duo E6600
1,257
Reviews Word on the street
Core2 Duo E6700 | vs | E6600 | ||
![]() | 6.0 | 8.0 |
---|
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo E6700 | vs | E6600 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.69 pt/W | 1.7 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,066 MHz | 1,066 MHz |
details | Core2 Duo E6700 | vs | E6600 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 291,000,000 | 291,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 10 | 9 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.5V | 0.85 - 1.5V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 60.1°C | Unknown - 60.1°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 7 | 47 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 3.35 GHz | 3.49 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.6 GHz | 3.45 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.35 GHz | 3.49 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Duo E6700 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo E6600 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||