CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E6600 vs 360 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo E6600

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo E6600

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.4 GHz More than 70% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,257 vs 424 Around 3x better PassMark (Single core) score
Newer Jul, 2006 vs Aug, 2004 Release date over 1 years later
Better PassMark score 1,884 vs 327 More than 5.8x better PassMark score
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.45 GHz vs 1.4 GHz Around 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron M 360

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 360

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 17.06W vs 52.81W 3.1x lower typical power consumption
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.83 GHz vs 3.49 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much lower annual home energy cost 5.06 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 3.1x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 18.4 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 3.1x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo E6600 vs Celeron M 360

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo E6600  vs
Celeron M 360 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
479

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 65W 21W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 5.06 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 18.4 $/year
Performance per watt 1.7 pt/W 1.45 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 17.06W

details

Core2 Duo E6600  vs
Celeron M 360 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 4 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 90 nm
Transistor count 291,000,000 144,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 9 14
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.5V 1 - 1.29V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.49 GHz 4.83 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.45 GHz 1.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.49 GHz 4.83 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 1,066 MHz 400 MHz
Intel Core2 Duo E6600
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 360
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus