0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo E6420 vs E4500 |
Released April, 2007
Intel Core2 Duo E6420
- 2.13 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo E6420
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes | ![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.37 GHz |
![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4 GHz |
VS
Released July, 2007
Intel Core2 Duo E4500
- 2.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the E4500
![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 73.3 °C |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.37 GHz | vs | 3.16 GHz | More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4 GHz | vs | 3.52 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 73.3 °C | vs | 60.1 °C | More than 20% higher Maximum operating temperature |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo E6420 vs E4500
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E6420
2,066
Core2 Duo E4500
2,102
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E6420
1,148
Core2 Duo E4500
1,146
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E6420
91,000 MB/s
Core2 Duo E4500
93,900 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E6420
1,947
Core2 Duo E4500
1,988
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E6420
2,170
Core2 Duo E4500
3,565
GeekBench
Core2 Duo E6420
3,573
Core2 Duo E4500
3,575
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo E6420
1,362
Core2 Duo E4500
1,275
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo E6420
806
Core2 Duo E4500
817
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo E6420 | vs | E4500 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.37 pt/W | 1.38 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,066 MHz | 800 MHz |
details | Core2 Duo E6420 | vs | E4500 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 291,000,000 | 167,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 8 | 11 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.5V | 0.85 - 1.5V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 60.1°C | Unknown - 73.3°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.37 GHz | 3.16 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4 GHz | 3.52 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.37 GHz | 3.16 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Duo E6420 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo E4500 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $117 | |
E5300 vs E4500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $117 | |
E5200 vs E4500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $117 | |
E8400 vs E4500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $117 | |
3220 vs E4500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$74 | $117 | |
925 vs E4500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$67 | $117 | |
E5400 vs E4500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $117 | |
E5700 vs E4500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||