Intel Core2 Duo E6405 vs Celeron P4600 |
Announced September, 2013
Intel Core2 Duo E6405
- 2.13 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo E6405
 | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
VS
Released July, 2010
Intel Celeron P4600
- 2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Celeron P4600
| | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
| | Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W | | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 52.81W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | More than 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Core2 Duo E6405 vs Celeron P4600
clock speed
L2 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo E6405 | vs | Celeron P4600 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 771 | |||
| rPGA 988A | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 28.44W | |
details | Core2 Duo E6405 | vs | Celeron P4600 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.13 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.13 GHz | 2 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 500 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 667 MHz | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Core2 Duo E6405  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron P4600 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $86 | $225 | |
| P4600 vs 380M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $86 | ||
| P4600 vs P320 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $86 | $225 | |
| P4600 vs 350M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $86 | $21 | |
| P4600 vs 370M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $86 | $40 | |
| P4600 vs 2310M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $86 | $60 | |
| P4600 vs 560M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $86 | $250 | |
| P4600 vs 2520M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
