CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E6300 vs 440 among desktop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

3.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core2 Duo E6300 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core2 Duo E6300  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo E6300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo E6300

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Higher Maximum operating temperature 61.4 °C vs 60.4 °C Almost the same
Front view of Intel Celeron M 440

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 440

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.86 GHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 52.81W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.57 GHz vs 3.19 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.98 GHz vs 3.45 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo E6300 vs Celeron M 440

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core2 Duo E6300
79,500 MB/s
Celeron M 440
74,050 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo E6300  vs
Celeron M 440 
Clock speed 1.86 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
479
M

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 65W 35W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 1.18 pt/W 1.7 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 28.44W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 1,066 MHz 800 MHz

details

Core2 Duo E6300  vs
Celeron M 440 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 167,000,000 105,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 7 10
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.5V 1 - 1.34V
Operating temperature Unknown - 61.4°C Unknown - 60.4°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.19 GHz 3.57 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.45 GHz 3.98 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.19 GHz 3.57 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Core2 Duo E6300
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 440
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus