CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E6300 vs 200U among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD Sempron 200U 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Sempron 200U  based on its power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo E6300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo E6300

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.25 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 1.86 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 85% higher clock speed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.19 GHz vs 1 GHz Around 3.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.45 GHz vs 1 GHz Around 3.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD Sempron 200U

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 200U

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 6.5W vs 52.81W 8.1x lower typical power consumption
Newer Jan, 2009 vs Jul, 2006 Release date over 2 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 1.93 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 8.1x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 7.01 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 8.1x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo E6300 vs Sempron 200U

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo E6300  vs
Sempron 200U 
Clock speed 1.86 GHz 1 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 8W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 1.93 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 7.01 $/year
Performance per watt 1.18 pt/W 1.36 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 6.5W

details

Core2 Duo E6300  vs
Sempron 200U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.19 GHz 1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.45 GHz 1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.19 GHz 1 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Core2 Duo E6300
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 200U
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus