0 Comments
| Intel Core2 Duo E6300 vs AMD Sempron 140 |
Released July, 2006
Intel Core2 Duo E6300
- 1.86 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core2 Duo E6300
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | More cores 2 |
![]() | More threads 2 |
VS
Released July, 2009
AMD Sempron 140
- 2.7 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 140
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.7 GHz | ![]() | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 839 |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.69 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many threads | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.7 GHz | vs | 1.86 GHz | More than 45% higher clock speed | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 839 | vs | 694 | More than 20% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.69 GHz | vs | 3.19 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 36.56W | vs | 52.81W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 63 °C | vs | 61.4 °C | Around 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.93 GHz | vs | 3.45 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Jul, 2009 | vs | Jul, 2006 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo E6300 vs Sempron 140
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E6300
1,796
Sempron 140
1,324
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E6300
999
Sempron 140
1,331
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E6300
79,500 MB/s
Sempron 140
105,900 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core2 Duo E6300
1,696
Sempron 140
1,284
GeekBench
Core2 Duo E6300
2,974
Sempron 140
1,284
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core2 Duo E6300
1,112
Sempron 140
738
PassMark (Single Core)
Core2 Duo E6300
694
Sempron 140
839
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core2 Duo E6300 | vs | Sempron 140 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
AM3 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 45W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.18 pt/W | 1.95 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 36.56W | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 1,066 MHz | 2,000 MHz |
details | Core2 Duo E6300 | vs | Sempron 140 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.5V | 0.82 - 1.35V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 61.4°C | Unknown - 63°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 15 | 5 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 3.19 GHz | 3.69 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.45 GHz | 3.93 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.19 GHz | 3.69 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Core2 Duo E6300 ![]() | AMD Sempron 140 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$69 | ||
630 vs E6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
4400+ vs E6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$77 | ||
Pentium E6300 vs Core2 Duo E6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
E8400 vs E6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | ||
E5300 vs E6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
3220 vs 140 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
5000+ vs 140 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||