Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo E4500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo E4500

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 0.75 GHz Around 3x higher clock speed
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer Jul, 2007 vs Nov, 1999 Release date over 7 years later
Front view of AMD Athlon 750

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 750

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon 750 vs the Intel Core2 Duo E4500.

Features Key features of the Core2 Duo E4500  vs Athlon 750 

clock speed

Core2 Duo E4500
2.2 GHz
Athlon 750
0.75 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo E4500  vs
Athlon 750 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 0.75 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
Slot A

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

details

Core2 Duo E4500  vs
Athlon 750 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 180 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 52.81W N/A

bus

Clock speed 800 MHz 200 MHz
Intel Core2 Duo E4500
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 750
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus