CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E4300 vs 3200+ among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core2 Duo E4300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo E4300

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 77,000 MB/s vs 22.5 MB/s Around 3422.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all cpus, 2 MB l2 cache is just OK
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 1 MB/core l2 cache per core is just OK
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.21 GHz vs 2.59 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Higher Maximum operating temperature 61.4 °C vs 55 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better performance per watt 1.14 pt/W vs 0.31 pt/W Around 3.8x better performance per watt
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Sempron 3200+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 3200+

Report a correction
Slightly lower typical power consumption 50.38W vs 52.81W Around 5% lower typical power consumption
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year vs 56.94 $/year Around 5% lower annual commercial energy cost
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year vs 15.66 $/year Around 5% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo E4300 vs Sempron 3200+

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core2 Duo E4300
77,000 MB/s
Sempron 3200+
22.5 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core2 Duo E4300  vs
Sempron 3200+ 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
939
AM2

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 62W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 14.94 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 54.31 $/year
Performance per watt 1.14 pt/W 0.31 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 50.38W

details

Core2 Duo E4300  vs
Sempron 3200+ 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 61.4°C Unknown - 55°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.21 GHz 2.59 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.6 GHz 3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.21 GHz 2.59 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 800 MHz 333 MHz
Intel Core2 Duo E4300
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 3200+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus