Intel Core i7 965 vs AMD FX 8350

	Performance
	Benchmark performance using all cores
Core i7 965 5.9 FX 8350 8.8 Core i7 3770K 9.7
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

	Single-core Performance
	Individual core benchmark performance
Core i7 965 2.4 FX 8350 7.2 Core i7 3770K 10.0
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

	Integrated Graphics
	Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Core i7 965 0.0 FX 8350 0.0 Core i7 3770K 1.2
Fire Strike

	Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)
	Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Core i7 965 0.0 FX 8350 0.0 Core i7 3770K 2.5
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

	Performance per Watt
	How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Core i7 965 4.0 FX 8350 5.3 Core i7 3770K 9.0
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

	Value
	Are you paying a premium for performance?
Core i7 965 n.d. FX 8350 6.1 Core i7 3770K 5.3
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.6	CPUBoss Score
	Combination of all six facets
Core i7 965 3.5 FX 8350 5.6 Core i7 3770K 7.3

Winner
Intel Core i7 965

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 965 based on its .

See full details

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

VS

Intel Core i7 965

Front view of Intel Core i7 965

Front view of AMD FX 8350

AMD FX 8350

Join the discussion

Front view of Intel Core i7 965

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 965

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Core i7 965 vs the AMD FX 8350.

Front view of AMD FX 8350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8350

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD FX 8350 vs the Intel Core i7 965.

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

8,711

11,483

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

2,202

2,193

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

142,500 MB/s

2,470,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

9,119

10,956

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

9,158

12,126

GeekBench

10,840

12,796

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

5,888

9,134

PassMark (Single Core)

1,383

1,525

summary	Core i7 965	vs	FX 8350
Clock speed	3.2 GHz		4 GHz
Turbo clock speed	3.46 GHz		4.2 GHz
Cores	Quad core		Octa core
Socket type
LGA 1366
AM3+
Is unlocked	Yes		Yes
features
Has a NX bit	Yes		Yes
Has virtualization support	Yes		Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling	Yes		Yes
integrated graphics
GPU	None		None
Label	N/A		N/A
Latest DirectX	N/A		N/A
Number of displays supported	N/A		N/A
GPU clock speed	N/A		N/A
Turbo clock speed	N/A		N/A
3DMark06	N/A		N/A
bus
Clock speed	1,066 MHz		2,600 MHz

details	Core i7 965	vs	FX 8350
Architecture	x86-64		x86-64
Threads	8		8
L2 cache	4 MB		8 MB
L2 cache per core	1 MB/core		1 MB/core
L3 cache	8 MB		8 MB
L3 cache per core	2 MB/core		1 MB/core
Manufacture process	45 nm		32 nm
Transistor count	731,000,000		1,200,000,000
Max CPUs	1		1
Clock multiplier	24		21
Voltage range	0.8 - 1.38V		0.81 - 1.45V
Operating temperature	Unknown - 67.9°C		Unknown - 61°C
overclocking
Overclock popularity	16		709
Overclocked clock speed	4.54 GHz		4.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water)	3.73 GHz		8.79 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air)	4.54 GHz		4.69 GHz
power consumption
TDP	130W		125W
Annual home energy cost	31.32 $/year		56.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost	113.88 $/year		159.62 $/year
Performance per watt	1.62 pt/W		5.72 pt/W
Typical power consumption	105.63W		159.66W
memory controller
Memory controller	Built-in		Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1066
DDR3-800
DDR3
Channels	Triple Channel		Dual Channel
Supports ECC	No		Yes
Maximum bandwidth	25,599.99 MB/s		29,866.66 MB/s

Intel Core i7 965

Report a correction

AMD FX 8350

Report a correction

Follow us

Compare

Popular Comparisons

VS

965 vs 4770K

VS

8350 vs 3770K

Comments

comments powered by Disqus