CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 950 vs 930 among desktop CPUs (over 75W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

3.1

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 950 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 950  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 950

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 950

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 950 vs the 930.

Front view of Intel Core i7 930

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 930

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 930 vs the 950.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 950 vs 930

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 950
8,385
Core i7 930
7,828

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 950
2,085
Core i7 930
2,016

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 950
137,000 MB/s
Core i7 930
126,500 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 950
8,066
Core i7 930
7,522

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 950
8,868
Core i7 930
8,177

GeekBench

Core i7 950
9,995
Core i7 930
9,439

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Core i7 950
5,595
Core i7 930
5,176

PassMark (Single Core)

Core i7 950
1,324
Core i7 930
1,215

Reviews Word on the street

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 950  vs
930 
Clock speed 3.06 GHz 2.8 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.33 GHz 3.06 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 1366
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture QPI QPI
Number of links 1 1
Data rate 19,200 MB/s 19,200 MB/s
Transfer rate 4,800 MT/s 4,800 MT/s
Clock speed 2,400 MHz 2,400 MHz

details

Core i7 950  vs
930 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 8
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 731,000,000 731,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 23 21
Voltage range 0.8 - 1.38V 0.8 - 1.38V
Operating temperature Unknown - 67.9°C Unknown - 67.9°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 285 209
Overclock review score 4.5 4.5
Overclocked clock speed 4.25 GHz 4.21 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.2 GHz 4.62 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 3,815.5 3,501.5
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.25 GHz 4.21 GHz

power consumption

TDP 130W 130W
Annual home energy cost 31.32 $/year 31.32 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 113.88 $/year 113.88 $/year
Performance per watt 1.55 pt/W 1.45 pt/W
Typical power consumption 105.63W 105.63W

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3-800
DDR3
Channels Triple Channel Triple Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,599.99 MB/s 25,599.99 MB/s
Maximum memory size 24,576 MB 24,576 MB
Intel Core i7 950
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 930
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus