Winner
Intel Core i7 950
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 950 based on its .
See full details Intel Core i7 950 vs 920 |
Released June, 2009
Intel Core i7 950
- 3.06 GHz
- Quad core
4.2 Out of 10
by Legit Reviews (Dec, 2010)Both of these motherboards work great, but we could have saved ~$100.00 if we were to use a board like the GIGABYTE 880GMA-UD2H which is a great little board and is available for under $100.00.
VS
Released October, 2008
Intel Core i7 920
- 2.66 GHz
- Quad core
4 Out of 10
by kairi_zeroblade (Dec, 2011)Pros: You can get a 50% Overclock instantly,Great processing Bandwidth,Nice HUGE heatsink,L3 Cache size.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 950 vs 920 among desktop CPUs (over 75W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Fire Strike | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 4.2 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 950 vs the 920. | |||||||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 920 vs the 950. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 950 vs 920
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Reviews Word on the street
| Core i7 950 | vs | 920 | ||
 | Core i7 950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i7 950 | vs | 920 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.06 GHz | 2.66 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 2.93 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1366 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Data rate | 19,200 MB/s | 19,200 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 4,800 MT/s | 4,800 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 2,400 MHz | 2,400 MHz | |
details | Core i7 950 | vs | 920 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 8 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
| Transistor count | 731,000,000 | 731,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 23 | 20 | |
| Voltage range | 0.8 - 1.38V | 0.8 - 1.38V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 67.9°C | Unknown - 67.9°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 285 | 491 | |
| Overclock review score | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.25 GHz | 4.22 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.2 GHz | 4.24 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 3,815.5 | 3,419.4 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.25 GHz | 4.22 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 130W | 130W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | 48.38 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | 134.55 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.55 pt/W | 1.21 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 105.63W | 135.63W | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Triple Channel | Triple Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,599.99 MB/s | 25,599.99 MB/s | |
 Intel Core i7 950  Report a correction |  Intel Core i7 920 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $60 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i7 920 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | $60 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 920 | ||
 | VS | |
| $205 | $60 | |
| Intel Core i5 2400 vs i7 920 | ||
 | VS | |
| $777 | $60 | |
| Intel Xeon E5649 vs Core i7 920 | ||
 | VS | |
| $100 | $60 | |
| AMD FX 6300 vs Intel Core i7 920 | ||
 | VS | |
| $220 | $60 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500K vs i7 920 | ||
 | VS | |
| $155 | $60 | |
| Intel Core i7 860 vs 920 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9420 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
