Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 920

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 920

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 2.66 GHz vs 0.4 GHz Around 6.8x higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Newer Oct, 2008 vs Sep, 2000 Release date over 8 years later
Front view of AMD K6-IIIE+ 400

Reasons to consider the
AMD K6-IIIE+ 400

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD K6-IIIE+ 400 vs the Intel Core i7 920.

Features Key features of the Core i7 920  vs K6-IIIE+ 400 

clock speed

Core i7 920
2.66 GHz
K6-IIIE+ 400
0.4 GHz

L2 cache

K6-IIIE+ 400
0.25 MB

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 920  vs
K6-IIIE+ 400 
Clock speed 2.66 GHz 0.4 GHz
Socket type
LGA 1366
Super 7

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

bus

Clock speed 2,400 MHz 100 MHz

details

Core i7 920  vs
K6-IIIE+ 400 
L2 cache 1 MB 0.25 MB
Manufacture process 45 nm 180 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption 135.63W N/A
Intel Core i7 920
Report a correction
AMD K6-IIIE+ 400
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus