Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i7 5930K

Intel Core i7 5930K

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 6822EQ

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 6822EQ

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 20.31W vs 113.75W 5.6x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Much lower annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year vs 33.73 $/year 5.6x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year vs 122.64 $/year 5.6x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Oct, 2015 vs Jul, 2014 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of Intel Core i7 5930K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 5930K

Report a correction
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Much higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz 75% higher clock speed
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 3.7 GHz vs 2.8 GHz More than 30% higher turbo clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 2.75 pt/$ vs 0.58 pt/$ More than 4.8x better performance per dollar
More l3 cache 15 MB vs 8 MB Around 90% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.77 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better PassMark score 13,647 vs 6,489 More than 2x better PassMark score
Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,095 vs 1,512 Around 40% better PassMark (Single core) score
More cores 6 vs 4 2 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 12 vs 8 4 more threads
Better performance per watt 11.39 pt/W vs 8.69 pt/W More than 30% better performance per watt
More l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core vs 2 MB/core 25% more l3 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.45 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 6822EQ vs 5930K

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 6822EQ  vs
5930K 
Clock speed 2 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.8 GHz 3.7 GHz
Cores Quad core Hexa core
Is unlocked No Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 25W 140W
Annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year 33.73 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year 122.64 $/year
Performance per watt 8.69 pt/W 11.39 pt/W
Typical power consumption 20.31W 113.75W

bus

Architecture FSB QPI
Number of links 1 0
Transfer rate 8,000 MT/s 0 MT/s

details

Core i7 6822EQ  vs
5930K 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 12
L3 cache 8 MB 15 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 2.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2 GHz 4.77 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 4.45 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2 GHz 4.77 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 530 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR
Channels Dual Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 65,536 MB 65,536 MB
Intel Core i7 6822EQ
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 5930K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus