CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Core i7 6700T vs A10 6700T among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 6700T 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 6700T  based on its performance, single-core performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 6700T

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 6700T

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.35 GHz vs 2.5 GHz Around 75% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,970 vs 1,193 More than 65% better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better PassMark score 9,050 vs 3,702 Around 2.5x better PassMark score
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 36.56W More than 20% lower typical power consumption
Better performance per watt 7.07 pt/W vs 4.98 pt/W More than 40% better performance per watt
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Sep, 2013 Release date over 1 years later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 10.84 $/year More than 20% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 39.42 $/year More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD A10 6700T

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 6700T

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher GPU clock speed 720 MHz vs 350 MHz More than 2x higher GPU clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Better CompuBench 1.5 ocean surface simulation score 230.34 fps vs 214.16 fps Around 10% better CompuBench 1.5 ocean surface simulation score
Higher Maximum operating temperature 71.3 °C vs 66 °C Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 6700T vs A10 6700T

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 6700T
28.32 mHash/s
A10 6700T
59.56 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Core i7 6700T
25.06 mPixels/s
A10 6700T
4.79 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 6700T
214.16 fps
A10 6700T
230.34 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 6700T
1.49 fps
A10 6700T
0.6 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 6700T
11.18 fps
A10 6700T
15.08 fps

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

Core i7 6700T
29,281
A10 6700T
9,225

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

A10 6700T
3,702

PassMark (Single Core)

A10 6700T
1,193

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 6700T  vs
A10 6700T 
Clock speed 2.8 GHz 2.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
ABM
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 45W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 7.07 pt/W 4.98 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 36.56W

details

Core i7 6700T  vs
A10 6700T 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 4
L2 cache 1 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 66°C Unknown - 71.3°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.35 GHz 2.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4 GHz 2.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.35 GHz 2.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 530 Radeon HD 8650D
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 720 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Intel Core i7 6700T
Report a correction
AMD A10 6700T
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus