0 Comments
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs Celeron 300A |
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i7 6700K
- 4 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i7 6700K
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 4 GHz |
![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.61 GHz |
VS
Released August, 1998
Intel Celeron 300A
- 0.3 GHz
Reasons to buy the Celeron 300A
![]() | Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 85 °C |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 250 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher clock speed | 4 GHz | vs | 0.3 GHz | More than 13.2x higher clock speed | |||
Significantly more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.13 MB | Around 7.8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.61 GHz | vs | 0.47 GHz | More than 9.8x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Newer | Jul, 2015 | vs | Aug, 1998 | Release date over 17 years later | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.77 GHz | vs | 0.3 GHz | Around 16x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 85 °C | vs | 64 °C | Around 35% higher Maximum operating temperature |
Features Key features of the Core i7 6700K vs Celeron 300A
clock speed
Core i7 6700K
4 GHz
Celeron 300A
0.3 GHz
L2 cache
Core i7 6700K
1 MB
Celeron 300A
0.13 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Core i7 6700K
4.61 GHz
Celeron 300A
0.47 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Core i7 6700K
4.77 GHz
Celeron 300A
0.3 GHz
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i7 6700K | vs | Celeron 300A |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 4 GHz | 0.3 GHz | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
Typical power consumption | 73.94W | N/A |
details | Core i7 6700K | vs | Celeron 300A |
---|---|---|---|
L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.13 MB | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 250 nm | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 64°C | Unknown - 85°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.61 GHz | 0.47 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.77 GHz | 0.3 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.61 GHz | 0.47 GHz |
Intel Core i7 6700K ![]() | Intel Celeron 300A ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
Intel Core i7 6700K vs AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $390 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 5820K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $305 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 6700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
Intel Core i7 6700K vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||