Winner
Intel Core i7 6700K
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 6700K based on its performance and single-core performance.
See full details | Intel Core i7 6700K vs Atom C2750 |
![]() | Much higher clock speed 4 GHz | ![]() | Much higher turbo clock speed 4.2 GHz |
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 16.25W | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 11.79 pt/W |
![]() | More cores 8 | ![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 97 °C |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
9.1 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
Intel Core i7 6700KCPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 4 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | More than 65% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher turbo clock speed | 4.2 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | More than 60% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,349 | vs | 579 | More than 4x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better PassMark score | 11,109 | vs | 3,344 | More than 3.2x better PassMark score | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.61 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.77 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Jul, 2015 | vs | Jul, 2013 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 16.25W | vs | 73.94W | 4.6x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much better performance per watt | 11.79 pt/W | vs | 3.49 pt/W | More than 3.2x better performance per watt | |||
More cores | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 97 °C | vs | 64 °C | More than 50% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 1.38 pt/$ | vs | 0.91 pt/$ | More than 50% better performance per dollar | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 4.82 $/year | vs | 21.92 $/year | 4.6x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 17.52 $/year | vs | 79.72 $/year | 4.6x lower annual commercial energy cost |
summary | Core i7 6700K | vs | Atom C2750 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 4 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Octa core | |
features | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 91W | 20W | |
Annual home energy cost | 21.92 $/year | 4.82 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 79.72 $/year | 17.52 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.49 pt/W | 11.79 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 73.94W | 16.25W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 0 | 1 |
details | Core i7 6700K | vs | Atom C2750 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 8 | 8 | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 64°C | Unknown - 97°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.61 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.77 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.61 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 530 | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s |
Intel Core i7 6700K ![]() | Intel Atom C2750 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $390 | |
6700K vs 5820K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $305 | |
6700K vs 6700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
6700K vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $128 | |
6700K vs 8350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||