CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6700HQ vs 4810MQ among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 4810MQ 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 4810MQ  based on its single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 6700HQ

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 6700HQ

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Jan, 2014 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of Intel Core i7 4810MQ

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4810MQ

Report a correction
Much better performance per dollar 2.29 pt/$ vs 0.53 pt/$ More than 4.2x better performance per dollar
Much better performance per watt 20.02 pt/W vs 4.47 pt/W Around 4.5x better performance per watt
Higher turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz Around 10% higher turbo clock speed
Higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,056 vs 1,802 Around 15% better PassMark (Single core) score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 6700HQ vs 4810MQ

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 6700HQ
30.96 mHash/s
Core i7 4810MQ
12.25 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Core i7 6700HQ
25.48 mPixels/s
Core i7 4810MQ
8.86 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 4810MQ
1.42 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 6700HQ
4,040 MB/s
Core i7 4810MQ
4,180,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 6700HQ  vs
4810MQ 
Clock speed 2.6 GHz 2.8 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz 3.8 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3L-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 65,536 MB 32,768 MB

details

Core i7 6700HQ  vs
4810MQ 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 8
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 530 HD 4600

power consumption

TDP 45W 47W
Annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year 11.32 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year 41.17 $/year
Performance per watt 4.47 pt/W 20.02 pt/W
Typical power consumption 36.56W 38.19W

bus

Transfer rate 8,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s
Intel Core i7 6700HQ
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 4810MQ
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus