Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 610E

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 610E

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 62.56W 2.2x lower typical power consumption
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 18.55 $/year 2.2x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 67.45 $/year 2.2x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i7 3770

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3770

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2.53 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz More than 20% higher turbo clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 2.33 pt/$ vs 0.52 pt/$ More than 4.5x better performance per dollar
Much better turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz vs 766 MHz More than 50% better turbo clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More l3 cache 8 MB vs 4 MB 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Significantly better PassMark score 9,449 vs 2,544 Around 3.8x better PassMark score
Higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 500 MHz 30% higher GPU clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.03 GHz vs 2.53 GHz Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 2,072 vs 1,378 More than 50% better PassMark (Single core) score
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Significantly better performance per watt 7.25 pt/W vs 3.69 pt/W More than 95% better performance per watt
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Newer Apr, 2012 vs Jan, 2010 Release date over 2 years later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.32 GHz vs 2.53 GHz More than 70% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 610E vs 3770

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 610E  vs
3770 
Clock speed 2.53 GHz 3.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.2 GHz 3.9 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
BGA 1288
LGA 1155
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 77W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 18.55 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 67.45 $/year
Performance per watt 3.69 pt/W 7.25 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 62.56W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 2,500 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Core i7 610E  vs
3770 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 8
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 4 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 22 nm
Transistor count 382,000,000 1,300,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 20 34

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.53 GHz 4.03 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.53 GHz 4.32 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.53 GHz 4.03 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Number of displays supported 2 3
GPU clock speed 500 MHz 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed 766 MHz 1,150 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
DDR3-800
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 17,066.66 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 9,000.96 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Core i7 610E
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 3770
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus