0 Comments
| Intel Core i7 5960X vs AMD C 30 |
Released July, 2014
Intel Core i7 5960X
- 3 GHz
- Octa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i7 5960X
![]() | Much higher turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz | ![]() | Is unlocked Yes |
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3 GHz | ![]() | Much more l3 cache 20 MB |
VS
Released January, 2011
AMD C 30
- 1.2 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD C 30
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 7.31W | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 2.17 $/year | ![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 7.88 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher turbo clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | None | Compared to all cpus, 3.5 GHz turbo clock speed is just OK | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
Much higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 1.2 GHz | 2.5x higher clock speed | |||
Much more l3 cache | 20 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 40x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 40 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better PassMark score | 15,994 | vs | 310 | More than 51.5x better PassMark score | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,994 | vs | 318 | More than 6.2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
More cores | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 16 | vs | 1 | 15 more threads | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 5x more l3 cache per core | |||
Significantly better performance per watt | 7.19 pt/W | vs | 2.69 pt/W | Around 2.8x better performance per watt | |||
Newer | Jul, 2014 | vs | Jan, 2011 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 7.31W | vs | 113.75W | 15.6x lower typical power consumption | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 2.17 $/year | vs | 33.73 $/year | 15.6x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 7.88 $/year | vs | 122.64 $/year | 15.6x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 5960X vs AMD C 30
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i7 5960X
15,994
AMD C 30
310
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i7 5960X
1,994
AMD C 30
318
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i7 5960X | vs | AMD C 30 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.2 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.5 GHz | None | |
Cores | Octa core | Single core | |
Is unlocked | Yes | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
AMD-V | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR |
details | Core i7 5960X | vs | AMD C 30 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 16 | 1 | |
L3 cache | 20 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 40 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Radeon™ HD 6250 | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.0 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 276 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 140W | 9W | |
Annual home energy cost | 33.73 $/year | 2.17 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 122.64 $/year | 7.88 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 7.19 pt/W | 2.69 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 113.75W | 7.31W |
Intel Core i7 5960X ![]() | AMD C 30 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,016 | $350 | |
5960X vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,016 | $272 | |
5960X vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,016 | $580 | |
5960X vs 5930K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,016 | $230 | |
5960X vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,016 | $4,115 | |
5960X vs E5-2699 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,016 | $390 | |
5960X vs 5820K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,016 | $1,156 | |
5960X vs 4960X | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||