0 Comments
| Intel Core i7 5950HQ vs 4790 |
Released April, 2015
Intel Core i7 5950HQ
- 2.9 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i7 5950HQ
![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 38.19W |
![]() | Slightly better PassMark score 10,951 | ![]() | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 11.32 $/year |
VS
Released May, 2014
Intel Core i7 4790
- 3.6 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the 4790
![]() | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 70.7 | ![]() | Higher clock speed 3.6 GHz |
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 2.97 pt/$ | ![]() | Slightly higher turbo clock speed 4 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 38.19W | vs | 68.25W | Around 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
Slightly better PassMark score | 10,951 | vs | 9,996 | Around 10% better PassMark score | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 11.32 $/year | vs | 20.24 $/year | Around 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 41.17 $/year | vs | 73.58 $/year | Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Newer | Apr, 2015 | vs | May, 2014 | Release date 11 months later | |||
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 70.7 | vs | 45.1 | More than 55% better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
Higher clock speed | 3.6 GHz | vs | 2.9 GHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 2.97 pt/$ | vs | 0.56 pt/$ | More than 5.2x better performance per dollar | |||
Slightly higher turbo clock speed | 4 GHz | vs | 3.8 GHz | More than 5% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Slightly more l3 cache | 8 MB | vs | 6 MB | Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
Significantly better performance per watt | 10.77 pt/W | vs | 7.46 pt/W | Around 45% better performance per watt | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l3 cache per core | |||
Better turbo clock speed | 1,200 MHz | vs | 1,150 MHz | Around 5% better turbo clock speed | |||
Higher GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | vs | 300 MHz | More than 15% higher GPU clock speed |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 5950HQ vs 4790
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Core i7 5950HQ
45.1
Core i7 4790
70.7
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i7 5950HQ
10,951
Core i7 4790
9,996
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i7 5950HQ
2,263
Core i7 4790
2,284
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i7 5950HQ | vs | 4790 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 4 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB |
details | Core i7 5950HQ | vs | 4790 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 8 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® Iris™ Pro Graphics 6200 | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 300 MHz | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | 1,200 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 47W | 84W | |
Annual home energy cost | 11.32 $/year | 20.24 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 41.17 $/year | 73.58 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 7.46 pt/W | 10.77 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 38.19W | 68.25W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI 2.0 | DMI 2.0 | |
Number of links | 1 | 0 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
Intel Core i7 5950HQ ![]() | Intel Core i7 4790 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $225 | |
Intel Core i7 4790 vs i5 4690 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 4790 vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $305 | |
Intel Core i7 4790 vs 6700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $280 | |
Intel Core i7 4790 vs 4770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $240 | |
Intel Core i7 4790 vs i5 4690K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $240 | |
Intel Core i7 4790 vs 3770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $248 | |
Intel Core i7 4790 vs 4770K | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||