CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4820K vs 4770K among desktop CPUs (over 75W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 4820K 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 4820K  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 4820K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4820K

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 4820K vs the 4770K.

Front view of Intel Core i7 4770K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4770K

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 4820K vs 4770K

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 4820K
2,500,000 MB/s
Core i7 4770K
4,810,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 4820K  vs
4770K 
Clock speed 3.7 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz 3.9 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Is unlocked Yes Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 130W 84W
Annual home energy cost 31.32 $/year 20.24 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 113.88 $/year 73.58 $/year
Performance per watt 8.43 pt/W 11.31 pt/W
Typical power consumption 105.63W 68.25W

bus

Architecture DMI 2.0 DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 0
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Core i7 4820K  vs
4770K 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 8
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 10 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 66.8°C Unknown - 72.72°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.57 GHz 4.48 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.68 GHz 4.55 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 5,294.9 6,694.4
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.57 GHz 4.48 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4600
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,250 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Quad Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 59,733.32 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 65,536 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Core i7 4820K
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 4770K
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
This is a little bit biased as the 4770k higher score is mainly from the onboard Integrated graphics scoring getting added on, when any one looking at buying these cpu's will never use the on board graphics, they will fit a much needed GPU for the job, IE gaming or editing/design etc. 4770k had a cheaper price back then, plus it has some more Instruction set's which can be helpful... But if you are going to be doing 3d design, video editing rendering or any graphical work like YouTube video editing the 2011 socket is 100% better with its Quad channel memory! And 3D open word gaming like Far Cry 5 and games like Rust that need loads of ram, 12gb min, 32-64gb recommended when live streaming. If you cant afford or just don't want to spend 3k+ on a brand new video editing PC/Mac... You can build a second hand PC for under a grand that will beat them to bits for editing YouTube videos! or gaming... Here is how: 2011 socket motherboard, I like the GigaByte X79 or X99 UP4 etc, but all the top makes like Asus ASI make great boards... A cpu like Gen 3 or 4, I7 3930k, 4930k, 4960k, 4970x. 64-128GB of ram is very cheap now! The new 2019 16" MacBook Pro use's a AMD Radeon pro 5500m which is rubbish, there are loads of better cards for $100-$200 like GTX 1660TI 6GB, or MSI Radeon RX580 8GB can be had very cheap on Amazon, or even a GTX 1080 TI 11GB! If you bench mark a pc like this agents the new MacBook Pro it will beat it meany times over rendering 4 or 6k
koko
comments powered by Disqus