Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 4770K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4770K

Report a correction
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz 40% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More l3 cache 8 MB vs 2 MB 4x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l3 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.48 GHz vs 2.56 GHz Around 75% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Lower typical power consumption 68.25W vs 85.31W 20% lower typical power consumption
Newer Jun, 2013 vs Apr, 2008 Release date over 5 years later
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.55 GHz vs 2.5 GHz More than 80% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year vs 25.29 $/year Around 20% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year vs 91.98 $/year 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Opteron 8360 SE

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 8360 SE

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Features Key features of the Core i7 4770K  vs Opteron 8360 SE 

clock speed

Core i7 4770K
3.5 GHz
Opteron 8360 SE
2.5 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Core i7 4770K
4.48 GHz
Opteron 8360 SE
2.56 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Core i7 4770K
4.55 GHz
Opteron 8360 SE
2.5 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 4770K  vs
Opteron 8360 SE 
Clock speed 3.5 GHz 2.5 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Is unlocked Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 84W 105W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 25.29 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 91.98 $/year
Typical power consumption 68.25W 85.31W

details

Core i7 4770K  vs
Opteron 8360 SE 
Threads 8 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 8

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.48 GHz 2.56 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.55 GHz 2.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.48 GHz 2.56 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4600 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,250 MHz N/A
Intel Core i7 4770K
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 8360 SE
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus