Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD Opteron 6280 |
Released June, 2013
Intel Core i7 4770K
- 3.5 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i7 4770K
 | Significantly higher clock speed 3.5 GHz | | Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
| | Significantly lower typical power consumption 68.25W | | Much more l3 cache per core 2 MB/core |
by Legit Reviews (Jun, 2013)The AMD A10-5800K APU hasn't been in the lead in any benchmark yet, but here we can see that it excels in graphics and had an overall score in Fire Strike of 1098, which is 20% faster than the new Intel Core i7-4770K processor.
VS
First seen on January, 2013
AMD Opteron 6280
- 2.5 GHz
- 16 core
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 6280
| | Much more l2 cache 16 MB | | More cores 16 |
| | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 | | More l3 cache 16 MB |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | 40% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 68.25W | vs | 93.44W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much more l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 2x more l3 cache per core | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | vs | 27.7 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | vs | 100.74 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 16 MB | vs | 1 MB | 16x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| More cores | 16 | vs | 4 | 12 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| More l3 cache | 16 MB | vs | 8 MB | 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| More threads | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many threads | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Core i7 4770K vs Opteron 6280
clock speed
L2 cache
L3 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i7 4770K | vs | Opteron 6280 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | 16 core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
details | Core i7 4770K | vs | Opteron 6280 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 8 | 16 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 16 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 16 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 4 | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 84W | 115W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | 27.7 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | 100.74 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 68.25W | 93.44W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI 2.0 | HyperTransport 3.0 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 6,400 MT/s | |
 Intel Core i7 4770K  Report a correction |  AMD Opteron 6280 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $248 | $272 | |
| 4770K vs 4790K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $248 | $192 | |
| 4770K vs 4670K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $248 | $128 | |
| 4770K vs 8350 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $248 | $264 | |
| 4770K vs 3770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $248 | $260 | |
| 4770K vs 4820K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $248 | $115 | |
| 4770K vs 7850K | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
