Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i7 4770K

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i7 4770K

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 4770K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4770K

Report a correction
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Much higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz 75% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 2,165 vs 911 Around 2.5x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better performance per watt 11.31 pt/W vs 3.84 pt/W Around 3x better performance per watt
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.48 GHz vs 2.8 GHz More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better PassMark score 10,016 vs 5,025 Around 2x better PassMark score
Significantly more l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l3 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.55 GHz vs 2.8 GHz More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Jun, 2013 vs Nov, 2012 Release date 6 months later
Front view of AMD Opteron 4365

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 4365

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 1 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much lower typical power consumption 32.5W vs 68.25W 2.1x lower typical power consumption
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
More cores 8 vs 4 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Much lower annual home energy cost 9.64 $/year vs 20.24 $/year 2.1x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 35.04 $/year vs 73.58 $/year 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 4770K vs Opteron 4365

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 4770K  vs
Opteron 4365 
Clock speed 3.5 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Quad core Octa core
Is unlocked Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0

power consumption

TDP 84W 40W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 9.64 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 35.04 $/year
Performance per watt 11.31 pt/W 3.84 pt/W
Typical power consumption 68.25W 32.5W

details

Core i7 4770K  vs
Opteron 4365 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 8
L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 2
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.72°C Unknown - 70°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.48 GHz 2.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.55 GHz 2.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.48 GHz 2.8 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4600 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,250 MHz N/A

bus

Architecture DMI 2.0 HyperTransport 3.0
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 6,400 MT/s
Intel Core i7 4770K
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 4365
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus