CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4770K vs 9370

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 1 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

Winner
Intel Core i7 4770K 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 4770K  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i7 4770K

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i7 4770K

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 4770K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4770K

Report a correction
Is hyperthreaded Yes vs No Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 68.25W vs 178.75W 2.6x lower typical power consumption
Much more l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l3 cache per core
Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,165 vs 1,611 Around 35% better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better performance per watt 12.71 pt/W vs 5.14 pt/W Around 2.5x better performance per watt
Better geekbench (64-bit) score 15,778 vs 11,555 More than 35% better geekbench (64-bit) score
Better 3DMark11 physics score 9,140 vs 7,420 Around 25% better 3DMark11 physics score
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year vs 192.72 $/year 2.6x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year vs 53 $/year 2.6x lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD FX 9370

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 9370

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 1 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 4.7 GHz vs 3.9 GHz More than 20% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly higher clock speed 4.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz More than 25% higher clock speed
More cores 8 vs 4 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 5.29 GHz vs 4.47 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better performance per dollar 7.08 pt/$ vs 4.31 pt/$ Around 65% better performance per dollar

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 4770K vs FX 9370

GeekBench (32-bit)

Core i7 4770K
14,351
FX 9370
11,795

GeekBench (64-bit)

Core i7 4770K
15,778
FX 9370
11,555

GeekBench

Core i7 4770K
18,498
FX 9370
11,795

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

FX 9370
7,420
Core i7 4770K FX 9370 @ community.futuremark.com

Passmark

Core i7 4770K
10,016
FX 9370
9,578
Core i7 4770K FX 9370 @ cpubenchmark.net

Passmark (Single Core)

FX 9370
1,611

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 4770K  vs
FX 9370 
Clock speed 3.5 GHz 4.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz 4.7 GHz
Cores Quad core Octa core
Is unlocked Yes Yes
Is hyperthreaded Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
XOP
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 84W 220W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 53 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 192.72 $/year
Performance per watt 12.71 pt/W 5.14 pt/W
Typical power consumption 68.25W 178.75W

details

Core i7 4770K  vs
FX 9370 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 8
L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.47 GHz 5.29 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.53 GHz 4.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.47 GHz 5.29 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4600 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,250 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 29,866.66 MB/s
Intel Core i7 4770K
Report a correction
AMD FX 9370
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 10 comments.
I have an i5-3360m/amd 7570m laptop. The 7570m crushes the HD 4000. XD
cpuboss.com gargles the intel sac... you need to have true testers and everyday users do your ratings.... i dont mind either cpu company but i built a custom system with the amd fx-9370 and i have never seen an intel i7 handle work loads like this amd chip does... i dare you to find me a piece of software that will push this amd chip into turbo .... intel i7 turbos on start up, it turbos playing candy crush... give me a break!!!!
The Only reason to consider Intel processor is the built in GPU.
Well it could be more depending on where you live
naw mate the 4770k has its hyperthreading it suckerpunches all amd cpu's
You guys seriously need to actually put processors to processors for your matching up comprehension because the AMD FX 9370 and FX 9590 surely beats the INTEL I7 4770K in real world performance tests. get both and set them up with equivalent parts( motherboards, ram memory, ssd`s and the processors and good cooler systems and watch what happens. dont forget the os most be the same
one could give a damn to paying additional $20 a year lol
Overclock with watercooling is the same as with air cooling? Are you serious? This is not a bias review, this is a stupid ass review
Im sure people overclock the amd chips to 5ghz Ive found most cpu boss intel bias and many times intel chips win for the single core performance and the $20 a year power saving
You have it all wrong with the overclocking, you have not overvlovked the 9370, you have just stated its standard frequency.
comments powered by Disqus