Winner
Intel Core i7 4770K
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 4770K based on its .
See full details| | Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9370 |
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Is hyperthreaded Yes |
| | Newer manufacturing process 22 nms | | Much lower typical power consumption 68.25W |
by Legit Reviews (Jun, 2013)The AMD A10-5800K APU hasn't been in the lead in any benchmark yet, but here we can see that it excels in graphics and had an overall score in Fire Strike of 1098, which is 20% faster than the new Intel Core i7-4770K processor.
| | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | | Significantly higher turbo clock speed 4.7 GHz |
| | Significantly higher clock speed 4.4 GHz | | More cores 8 |
by Jarred-Walton (Jun, 2013)These chips are the result of tuning and binning on GlobalFoundries’ 32nm SOI process, though the latest jump from the existing FX-8350 is nonetheless quite impressive.
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| Core i7 4770K 8.5 FX 9370 8.1 | |
| Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Core i7 4770K 9.7 FX 9370 8.5 | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Overclocking | |
How much speed can you get out of the processor? | |
| Core i7 4770K 9.6 FX 9370 10.0 | |
| Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 1 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Core i7 4770K 6.6 FX 9370 7.4 | |
| Performance Per Dollar | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value | |
| Core i7 4770K 8.9 FX 9370 8.3 | |
Winner |
Intel Core i7 4770KCPUBoss Winner | | |
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core | |||
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nms | vs | 32 nms | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 68.25W | vs | 178.75W | 2.6x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,165 | vs | 1,612 | Around 35% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Much more l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 2x more l3 cache per core | |||
| Significantly better performance per watt | 13.14 pt/W | vs | 5.31 pt/W | Around 2.5x better performance per watt | |||
| Better geekbench (32-bit) score | 14,339 | vs | 11,841 | More than 20% better geekbench (32-bit) score | |||
| Better 3DMark11 physics score | 9,140 | vs | 7,420 | Around 25% better 3DMark11 physics score | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | vs | 192.72 $/year | 2.6x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | vs | 53 $/year | 2.6x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 1 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 4.7 GHz | vs | 3.9 GHz | More than 20% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 4.4 GHz | vs | 3.5 GHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
| More cores | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Better performance per dollar | 5.22 pt/$ | vs | 3.4 pt/$ | Around 55% better performance per dollar | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 5.29 GHz | vs | 4.47 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 5.22 GHz | vs | 4.66 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Core i7 4770K | by Legit Reviews (Jun, 2013)Futuremark 3DMark has three primary benchmark tests that you can run and which test you should be running depends on the system that you are benchmarking on.
Core i7 4770K | by Legit Reviews (Jun, 2013)If you look closer at the results for Cloud Gate you'll see that AMD won in the graphics tests, but lost in the Physics test, so Futuremark 3DMark must have more weight on the physics test than the GPU test in this test scenario.
summary | Core i7 4770K | vs | FX 9370 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 4.4 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 4.7 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Octa core | |
| Is unlocked | Yes | Yes | |
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | No | |
features | |||
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| F16C | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,250 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1866 | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
details | Core i7 4770K | vs | FX 9370 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 8 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nms | 32 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.47 GHz | 5.29 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.66 GHz | 5.22 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.47 GHz | 5.29 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 84W | 220W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | 53 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | 192.72 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 13.14 pt/W | 5.31 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 68.25W | 178.75W | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K | AMD FX 9370 |
| VS | |
| $325 | $253 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $340 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs 4790K | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $170 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 8350 | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $195 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs 4790 | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $235 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs i5 4670K | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $276 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs Xeon E3-1240 v3 | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $332 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs I7 4820k | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $253 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
| VS | |
| $225 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 3110M vs N3530 | ||
| VS | |
| $225 | ||
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron N2830 | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $340 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs 4790K | ||
| VS | |
| $281 | $97 | |
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
| VS | |
| $378 | ||
| AMD A10 5750M vs Intel Core i7 4700MQ | ||
| VS | |
| Samsung Exynos 5 Octa vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 | ||