Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 4770K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4770K

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 45% higher clock speed
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Much more l3 cache 8 MB vs 0.5 MB 16x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 8 vs 2 6 more threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.48 GHz vs 3.28 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better PassMark score 10,016 vs 1,436 Around 7x better PassMark score
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 2,165 vs 800 Around 2.8x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 14,351 vs 2,093 More than 6.8x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Much better performance per watt 11.31 pt/W vs 1.14 pt/W Around 10x better performance per watt
Much more l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l3 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.55 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Higher Maximum operating temperature 72.72 °C vs 71.5 °C Almost the same
Front view of AMD E2 3200

Reasons to consider the
AMD E2 3200

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 68.25W Around 25% lower typical power consumption
Newer Nov, 2019 vs Jun, 2013 Release date over 6 years later
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 20.24 $/year Around 25% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 73.58 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 4770K vs E2 3200

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 4770K
14,351
E2 3200
2,093

GeekBench

Core i7 4770K
18,498
E2 3200
2,093

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Core i7 4770K
10,016
E2 3200
1,436

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 4770K  vs
E2 3200 
Clock speed 3.5 GHz 2.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz None
Cores Quad core Dual core
Is unlocked Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 84W 65W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 11.31 pt/W 1.14 pt/W
Typical power consumption 68.25W 52.81W

details

Core i7 4770K  vs
E2 3200 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.72°C Unknown - 71.5°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.48 GHz 3.28 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.55 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.48 GHz 3.28 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4600 AMD Radeon HD 6370D

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
Intel Core i7 4770K
Report a correction
AMD E2 3200
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus