CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4770K vs 5200 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 4770K 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 4770K  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 4770K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4770K

Report a correction
Much higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz vs 0 GHz Compared to all cpus, 3.9 GHz turbo clock speed is just OK
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Much higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz 75% higher clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More l3 cache 8 MB vs None Compared to all cpus, 8 MB l3 cache is just OK
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 2,165 vs 778 More than 2.8x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.48 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better PassMark score 10,016 vs 2,403 Around 4.2x better PassMark score
Significantly better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score 14.12 fps vs 6.93 fps More than 2x better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.55 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Better performance per watt 11.29 pt/W vs 9.39 pt/W More than 20% better performance per watt
Front view of AMD A6 5200

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 5200

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much lower typical power consumption 20.31W vs 68.25W 3.4x lower typical power consumption
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 600 MHz vs 350 MHz More than 70% higher GPU clock speed
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 72.72 °C Around 25% higher Maximum operating temperature
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year vs 73.58 $/year 3.4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year vs 20.24 $/year 3.4x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 4770K vs A6 5200

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 4770K
16.33 mHash/s
A6 5200
19 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 4770K
1.97 fps
A6 5200
0.51 fps

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark

A6 5200
1,790

Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark

A6 5200
1,486

Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark

A6 5200
2,476

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 4770K
14,184
A6 5200
3,330

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A6 5200
1,061

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 4770K
4,810,000 MB/s
A6 5200
982,400 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 4770K  vs
A6 5200 
Clock speed 3.5 GHz 2 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz 0 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Is unlocked Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 84W 25W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 6.02 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 21.9 $/year
Performance per watt 11.29 pt/W 9.39 pt/W
Typical power consumption 68.25W 20.31W

details

Core i7 4770K  vs
A6 5200 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB None
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.72°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.48 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.55 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.48 GHz 2 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4600 Radeon™ HD 8400
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 600 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
Intel Core i7 4770K
Report a correction
AMD A6 5200
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus