CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4770K vs 7850K among desktop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

9.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 4770K 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 4770K  based on its performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 4770K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4770K

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score 1.97 fps vs 1.44 fps More than 35% better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score
Much better cinebench r10 32Bit score 30,095 vs 14,027 Around 2.2x better cinebench r10 32Bit score
Front view of AMD A10 7850K

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 7850K

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better performance per dollar 6.84 pt/$ vs 3.82 pt/$ Around 80% better performance per dollar
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Higher clock speed 3.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 68.25W Around 25% lower typical power consumption
Newer Jan, 2014 vs Jun, 2013 Release date 7 months later
Lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 20.24 $/year Around 25% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 73.58 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 4770K vs A10 7850K

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 4770K
16.33 mHash/s
A10 7850K
89.37 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 4770K
1.97 fps
A10 7850K
1.44 fps

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark

A10 7850K
3,374

Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark

A10 7850K
6,222

Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark

A10 7850K
7,530

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 4770K
14,184
A10 7850K
7,022

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A10 7850K
2,328

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 4770K
4,810,000 MB/s
A10 7850K
2,370,000 MB/s

Reviews Word on the street

Core i7 4770K  vs A10 7850K 

7.0
6.0
A 15% to 25% increase in GPU performance over Ivy Bridge isn't going to be enough to replace a dedicated video card for gaming enthusiasts, but it does represent a solid step forward for the architecture as a whole.
Core i7 4770K

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 4770K  vs
A10 7850K 
Clock speed 3.5 GHz 3.7 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz 4 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Is unlocked Yes Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-2133
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 34,133.32 MB/s

details

Core i7 4770K  vs
A10 7850K 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 4
L2 cache 1 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.72°C Unknown - 72.4°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4600 Radeon™ R7 Series

power consumption

TDP 84W 65W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 11.28 pt/W 9.86 pt/W
Typical power consumption 68.25W 52.81W
Intel Core i7 4770K
Report a correction
AMD A10 7850K
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
everybody's absolutely forgetting that its not a CPU its not dedicated. It is created to provide the best of both worlds not to just boost and absolutely go insane just on processing power but to also combine a lot of GPU replacement in order to get you a easy and good experience. also Intel integrated graphics have absolute nothing on a AMD APU
comments powered by Disqus