Winner
Intel Core i7 4770
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 4770 based on its .
See full details Intel Core i7 4770 vs AMD FX 8350 |
Released June, 2013
Intel Core i7 4770
- 3.4 GHz
- Quad core
8.5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i7 4770
 | Is hyperthreaded Yes | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
| | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Much lower typical power consumption 68.25W |
by Shawn-Baker (Jun, 2013)Overclocking as you'd expect brings with it a performance boost and we look forward to gaining even more MHz off the CPU in the coming weeks as we use the platform more and more, and hence become better skilled at overclocking the new Haswell chips.
VS
Released October, 2012
AMD FX 8350
- 4 GHz
- Octa core
- Unlocked
8.1 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD FX 8350
| | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | | Is unlocked Yes |
| | Higher clock speed 4 GHz | | Higher turbo clock speed 4.2 GHz |
by Tech Radar (Nov, 2012)Like the K Series Intel chips, the entire FX range is unlocked, so overclocking is definitely on the menu.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4770 vs 8350
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Overclocking | |
How much speed can you get out of the processor? | |
| Passmark (Overclocked), Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 1 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Performance Per Dollar | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value | |
 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core i7 4770CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 68.25W | vs | 159.66W | 2.3x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much more l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 2x more l3 cache per core | |||
| Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,029 | vs | 1,525 | Around 35% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Significantly better performance per watt | 14.78 pt/W | vs | 4.96 pt/W | Around 3x better performance per watt | |||
| Better 3DMark11 physics score | 8,940 | vs | 6,880 | Around 30% better 3DMark11 physics score | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | vs | 56.1 $/year | 2.8x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Better geekbench (64-bit) score | 14,087 | vs | 12,190 | More than 15% better geekbench (64-bit) score | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | vs | 159.62 $/year | 2.2x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Newer | Jun, 2013 | vs | Oct, 2012 | Release date 7 months later | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 1 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
| Higher clock speed | 4 GHz | vs | 3.4 GHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 4.2 GHz | vs | 3.9 GHz | Around 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| More cores | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Much better PassMark (Overclocked) score | 10,147 | vs | 3,086.9 | More than 3.2x better PassMark (Overclocked) score | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.7 GHz | vs | 3.86 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.99 GHz | vs | 3.4 GHz | More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Slightly better performance per dollar | 6.33 pt/$ | vs | 5.61 pt/$ | Around 15% better performance per dollar | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 4770 vs FX 8350
GeekBench (32-bit)
GeekBench (64-bit)
GeekBench
3D Mark 11 (Physics)
Passmark
Passmark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i7 4770 | vs | FX 8350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 4 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 4.2 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Octa core | |
| Is unlocked | No | Yes | |
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| AVX 1.1 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| AVX | |||
| XOP | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| CLMUL | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| F16C | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| ABM | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| AES | |||
| TBM | |||
| CVT16 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| BMI1 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 84W | 125W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | 56.1 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | 159.62 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 14.78 pt/W | 4.96 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 68.25W | 159.66W | |
details | Core i7 4770 | vs | FX 8350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 8 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.86 GHz | 4.7 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.4 GHz | 4.99 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 3,086.9 | 10,147 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.86 GHz | 4.7 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,200 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1866 | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 29,866.66 MB/s | |
 Intel Core i7 4770  Report a correction |  AMD FX 8350 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $170 | $215 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs Intel Core i5 4690K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $170 | $189 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs Intel Core i5 4460 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $170 | $330 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs Intel Core i7 4790K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $170 | $329 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs Intel Core i7 3770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $170 | $139 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs 8320 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $170 | $330 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $170 | $226 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs Intel Core i5 3570K | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $330 | $225 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $330 | $364 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 5820K | ||
| | VS | |
| $330 | $215 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs i5 4690K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $49 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 3110M vs Pentium N3530 | ||
| | VS | |
| $170 | $215 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs Intel Core i5 4690K | ||
