Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 4750HQ

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4750HQ

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More l3 cache 6 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all cpus, 6 MB l3 cache is just OK
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 49 °C More than 2x higher Maximum operating temperature
Much more l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 1.5 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK
More threads 8 vs 1 7 more threads
Lower typical power consumption 38.19W vs 54.44W Around 30% lower typical power consumption
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
Lower annual home energy cost 11.32 $/year vs 16.14 $/year Around 30% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 41.17 $/year vs 58.69 $/year Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon 3200+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 3200+

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core

Features Key features of the Core i7 4750HQ  vs Athlon 3200+ 

clock speed

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 4750HQ  vs
Athlon 3200+ 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 47W 67W
Annual home energy cost 11.32 $/year 16.14 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 41.17 $/year 58.69 $/year
Typical power consumption 38.19W 54.44W

details

Core i7 4750HQ  vs
Athlon 3200+ 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 49°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® Iris™ Pro Graphics 5200 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 200 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,200 MHz N/A
Intel Core i7 4750HQ
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 3200+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus