Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i7 4710HQ

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i7 4710HQ

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 4710HQ

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4710HQ

Report a correction
Much better turbo clock speed 1,200 MHz vs 424 MHz More than 2.8x better turbo clock speed
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz Around 35% higher turbo clock speed
Higher clock speed 2.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 15.91 pt/W vs 4.7 pt/W Around 3.5x better performance per watt
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,836 vs 851 Around 2.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better PassMark score 7,814 vs 1,576 Around 5x better PassMark score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More threads 8 vs 2 6 more threads
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Higher GPU clock speed 400 MHz vs 327 MHz More than 20% higher GPU clock speed
Newer Apr, 2014 vs May, 2012 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of AMD R R-260H

Reasons to consider the
AMD R R-260H

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Significantly lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 38.19W 2.8x lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 11.32 $/year 2.8x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 41.17 $/year 2.8x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 4710HQ vs R R-260H

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

R R-260H
1,576

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 4710HQ  vs
R R-260H 
Clock speed 2.5 GHz 2.1 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
XOP
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 47W 17W
Annual home energy cost 11.32 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 41.17 $/year 14.89 $/year
Performance per watt 15.91 pt/W 4.7 pt/W
Typical power consumption 38.19W 13.81W

details

Core i7 4710HQ  vs
R R-260H 
Threads 8 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.5 GHz 2.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz 2.1 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4600 AMD Radeon HD 7500G
GPU clock speed 400 MHz 327 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,200 MHz 424 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3L-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Intel Core i7 4710HQ
Report a correction
AMD R R-260H
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus