Intel Core i7 4700MQ vs AMD A10 5750M

Released June, 2013

Reasons to buy the Intel Core i7 4700MQ

	Is hyperthreaded Yes		Newer manufacturing process 22 nms
	Much better turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz		More threads 8

Released March, 2013

Reasons to buy the AMD A10 5750M

	Much more l2 cache 4 MB		Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core
	Lower typical power consumption 28.44W		Higher GPU clock speed 533 MHz

It's a little bizarre that we saw Kabini and Temash first, since those chips marry AMD's updated Jaguar low-power CPU architecture with their current generation GCN GPU architecture; Richland is essentially old technology that's seen a healthy refinement.

by Dustin-Sklavos (Jun, 2013)

	Performance
	Benchmark performance using all cores
Core i7 4700MQ 9.3 A10 5750M 6.9
3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

	Single-core Performance
	Individual core benchmark performance
Core i7 4700MQ 9.2 A10 5750M 7.8
Passmark (Single Core)

	Power Consumption
	How much power does the processor require?
Core i7 4700MQ 5.2 A10 5750M 5.3
TDP

	Features
	How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?
Core i7 4700MQ 7.8 A10 5750M 4.9
Features and specifications that differ between products

	CPUBoss Score
	Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features
Core i7 4700MQ 8.3 A10 5750M 6.7

Winner
Intel Core i7 4700MQ

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 4700MQ based on its .

See full details

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4700MQ

Report a correction

Is hyperthreaded

Yes

Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core

Newer manufacturing process

22 nms

32 nms

A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor

Much better turbo clock speed

1,150 MHz

720 MHz

Around 60% better turbo clock speed

More threads

Twice as many threads

Much better 3DMark11 physics score

6,810

2,510

Around 2.8x better 3DMark11 physics score

Significantly better geekbench (32-bit) score

10,717

3,853

More than 2.8x better geekbench (32-bit) score

Significantly better 3DMark06 CPU score

6,873

3,243.5

More than 2x better 3DMark06 CPU score

Significantly better PassMark score

7,946

3,814

More than 2x better PassMark score

Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score

1,846

1,230

More than 50% better PassMark (Single core) score

Better performance per watt

22.21 pt/W

12.99 pt/W

More than 70% better performance per watt

Marginally newer

Jun, 2013

Mar, 2013

Release date 3 months later

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 5750M

Report a correction

Much more l2 cache

4 MB

1 MB

4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later

Much more l2 cache per core

1 MB/core

0.25 MB/core

4x more l2 cache per core

Lower typical power consumption

28.44W

38.19W

More than 25% lower typical power consumption

Higher GPU clock speed

533 MHz

400 MHz

Around 35% higher GPU clock speed

Higher Maximum Operating Temperature

105 °C

100 °C

5% higher Maximum Operating Temperature

Lower annual home energy cost

8.43 $/year

11.32 $/year

More than 25% lower annual home energy cost

GeekBench (32-bit)

Core i7 4700MQ

10,717

A10 5750M

3,853

browser.primatelabs.com

GeekBench

Core i7 4700MQ

11,841

A10 5750M

3,853

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

Core i7 4700MQ

6,810

A10 5750M

2,510

Core i7 4700MQ A10 5750M @ community.futuremark.com

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Core i7 4700MQ

6,873

A10 5750M

3,243.5

notebookcheck.net

Passmark

Core i7 4700MQ

7,946

A10 5750M

3,814

Core i7 4700MQ A10 5750M @ cpubenchmark.net

Passmark (Single Core)

Core i7 4700MQ

1,846

A10 5750M

1,230

cpubenchmark.net

summary	Core i7 4700MQ	A10 5750M
Clock speed	2.4 GHz	2.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed	3.4 GHz	3.5 GHz
Cores	Quad core	Quad core
Is unlocked	No	No
Is hyperthreaded	Yes	No
features
Has a NX bit	Yes	Yes
Has vitualization support	Yes	Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AVX 2.0
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling	Yes	Yes
power consumption
TDP	47W	35W
Annual home energy cost	11.32 $/year	8.43 $/year
Performance per watt	22.21 pt/W	12.99 pt/W
Typical power consumption	38.19W	28.44W

details	Core i7 4700MQ	A10 5750M
Threads	8	4
L2 cache	1 MB	4 MB
L2 cache per core	0.25 MB/core	1 MB/core
Manufacture process	22 nms	32 nms
Max CPUs	1	1
Operating temperature	Unknown - 100°C	Unknown - 105°C
gpu
GPU	GPU	GPU
Label	Intel® HD Graphics 4600	Radeon™ HD 8650G
GPU clock speed	400 MHz	533 MHz
Turbo clock speed	1,150 MHz	720 MHz

Intel Core i7 4700MQ

Report a correction

AMD A10 5750M

Report a correction

Intel Core i7 4700HQ vs 4700MQ

Intel Core i5 3230M vs AMD A10 5750M

Comments

Showing 1 comment.

Guest (01:22 PM, April 22, 2014)

The A10 5750m only works yet at 2.75 GHz Max. you can lock it at 3.2 GHz and you will feel a big performance boost. When AMD unlocks the A10 5750m to lock it at 3.5 GHz it will be much better than an I5 3230m ;) AMD APU´s are not bad im happy with my MSI GX60 BF4 with mantle is great i play on ultra settings. Avg 53 FPS Max. 106 Min. 28 when you play on high you get a crazy boost. : Min. 37 Avg. 72 Max 132. on mid : Min. 45 Avg. 89 Max. 143 So who says GX60 is bad ?!

	VS
$378		$378
Intel Core i7 4700HQ vs 4700MQ

	VS
$393		$378
Intel Core i7 4500U vs 4700MQ

	VS
$378		$378
Intel Core i7 4702MQ vs 4700MQ

	VS
$225		$378
Intel Core i5 4200M vs i7 4700MQ

	VS
$378		$378
Intel Core i7 3630QM vs 4700MQ

	VS
$225
Intel Core i5 3230M vs AMD A10 5750M

	VS
$378
Intel Core i7 3630QM vs AMD A10 5750M

	VS
		$340
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K

	VS
$340		$240
Intel Core i7 4770K vs i5 4670K

	VS
$332		$340
Intel Core I7 4820k vs i7 4770K

	VS
$240		$200
Intel Core i5 4670K vs AMD FX 8350

	VS
$393		$281
Intel Core i7 4500U vs i5 4200U

	VS
$281		$225
Intel Core i5 4200U vs 3230M

	VS
$378		$378
Intel Core i7 4700MQ vs 4700HQ

Intel Core i7 4700MQ vs AMD A10 5750M