Winner
Intel Core i7 4700MQ
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 4700MQ based on its .
See full details Intel Core i7 4700MQ vs AMD A10 5750M |
Released June, 2013
Intel Core i7 4700MQ
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
8.3 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i7 4700MQ
 | Is hyperthreaded Yes | | Newer manufacturing process 22 nms |
| | Much better turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz | | More threads 8 |
VS
Released March, 2013
AMD A10 5750M
- 2.5 GHz
- Quad core
6.7 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD A10 5750M
| | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
| | Lower typical power consumption 28.44W | | Higher GPU clock speed 533 MHz |
by Dustin-Sklavos (Jun, 2013)It's a little bizarre that we saw Kabini and Temash first, since those chips marry AMD's updated Jaguar low-power CPU architecture with their current generation GCN GPU architecture; Richland is essentially old technology that's seen a healthy refinement.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4700MQ vs 5750M
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| 3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Power Consumption | |
How much power does the processor require? | |
| TDP | |
Features | |
How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product? | |
| Features and specifications that differ between products | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core i7 4700MQCPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nms | vs | 32 nms | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much better turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | vs | 720 MHz | Around 60% better turbo clock speed | |||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Much better 3DMark11 physics score | 6,810 | vs | 2,510 | Around 2.8x better 3DMark11 physics score | |||
| Significantly better geekbench (32-bit) score | 10,717 | vs | 3,853 | More than 2.8x better geekbench (32-bit) score | |||
| Significantly better 3DMark06 CPU score | 6,873 | vs | 3,243.5 | More than 2x better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 7,946 | vs | 3,814 | More than 2x better PassMark score | |||
| Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,846 | vs | 1,230 | More than 50% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better performance per watt | 22.21 pt/W | vs | 12.99 pt/W | More than 70% better performance per watt | |||
| Marginally newer | Jun, 2013 | vs | Mar, 2013 | Release date 3 months later | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 1 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 38.19W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Higher GPU clock speed | 533 MHz | vs | 400 MHz | Around 35% higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Higher Maximum Operating Temperature | 105 °C | vs | 100 °C | 5% higher Maximum Operating Temperature | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 11.32 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 4700MQ vs A10 5750M
GeekBench (32-bit)
GeekBench
3D Mark 11 (Physics)
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Passmark
Passmark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i7 4700MQ | vs | A10 5750M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 47W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 11.32 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 22.21 pt/W | 12.99 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 38.19W | 28.44W | |
details | Core i7 4700MQ | vs | A10 5750M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 8 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nms | 32 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 100°C | Unknown - 105°C | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | Radeon™ HD 8650G | |
| GPU clock speed | 400 MHz | 533 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | 720 MHz | |
 Intel Core i7 4700MQ  Report a correction |  AMD A10 5750M Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $378 | $378 | |
| Intel Core i7 4700HQ vs 4700MQ | ||
 | VS | |
| $393 | $378 | |
| Intel Core i7 4500U vs 4700MQ | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $378 | |
| Intel Core i5 4200M vs i7 4700MQ | ||
 | VS | |
| $378 | $378 | |
| Intel Core i7 4702MQ vs 4700MQ | ||
 | VS | |
| $378 | $378 | |
| Intel Core i7 3630QM vs 4700MQ | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A10 5750M | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | ||
| Intel Core i5 3230M vs AMD A10 5750M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $340 | ||
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $340 | $240 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs i5 4670K | ||
 | VS | |
| $332 | $340 | |
| Intel Core I7 4820k vs i7 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $240 | $200 | |
| Intel Core i5 4670K vs AMD FX 8350 | ||
| | VS | |
| $393 | $281 | |
| Intel Core i7 4500U vs i5 4200U | ||
| | VS | |
| $378 | $378 | |
| Intel Core i7 4700MQ vs 4700HQ | ||
| | VS | |
| $281 | $225 | |
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs 3230M | ||
