Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i7 4700EQ

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i7 4700EQ

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 4700EQ

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4700EQ

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 38.19W vs 84.5W 2.2x lower typical power consumption
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,832 vs 822 Around 2.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better PassMark score 7,229 vs 703 More than 10.2x better PassMark score
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 65 °C Around 55% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Apr, 2013 vs Aug, 2005 Release date over 7 years later
More threads 8 vs 1 7 more threads
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
Significantly better performance per watt 4.04 pt/W vs 0.58 pt/W Around 7x better performance per watt
Much lower annual home energy cost 11.32 $/year vs 25.05 $/year 2.2x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 41.17 $/year vs 91.1 $/year 2.2x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Opteron 154

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 154

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.16 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 4700EQ vs Opteron 154

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 4700EQ  vs
Opteron 154 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Core i7 4700EQ  vs
Opteron 154 
Threads 8 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C 0 - 65°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.4 GHz 3.16 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 2.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz 3.16 GHz

power consumption

TDP 47W 104W
Annual home energy cost 11.32 $/year 25.05 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 41.17 $/year 91.1 $/year
Performance per watt 4.04 pt/W 0.58 pt/W
Typical power consumption 38.19W 84.5W
Intel Core i7 4700EQ
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 154
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus