CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4500U vs 4200M


Benchmark performance using all cores

3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?



How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

Intel Core i5 4200M 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 4200M  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
Front view of Intel Core i5 4200M

Intel Core i5 4200M

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 4500U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4500U

Report a correction
More l3 cache 4 MB vs 3 MB Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Significantly lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 30.06W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
Significantly better 3DMark11 physics score 5,480 vs 3,260 Around 70% better 3DMark11 physics score
Significantly better performance per watt 40 pt/W vs 13.99 pt/W More than 2.8x better performance per watt
More l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core Around 35% more l3 cache per core
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 8.91 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i5 4200M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 4200M

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 400 MHz vs 200 MHz 2x higher GPU clock speed
Supports more RAM 32,000 MB vs 16,384 MB Supports more than 95% more RAM
Better performance per dollar 2.37 pt/$ vs 1.53 pt/$ More than 55% better performance per dollar
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Jul, 2013 Release date 3 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 4500U vs i5 4200M

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

Core i7 4500U Core i5 4200M @ community.futuremark.com

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Core i7 4500U  vs
i5 4200M 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3 GHz 3.1 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No
Is hyperthreaded Yes Yes


Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
Supplemental SSE3
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,384 MB 32,000 MB


Core i7 4500U  vs
i5 4200M 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 4 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 100°C

integrated graphics

Label Intel® HD Graphics 4400 Intel® HD Graphics 4600
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 400 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz 1,150 MHz

power consumption

TDP 15W 37W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 8.91 $/year
Performance per watt 40 pt/W 13.99 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 30.06W


Architecture DMI 2.0 DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s
Intel Core i7 4500U
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 4200M
Report a correction

Read more


Showing 4 comments.
how do you mean.... did the battery die, the GPU or what? and wasn't it covered by the warranty? and furthermore, did it get extremely hot, as the 4200m has a higher power consumption, I would think that it got quite hot during gaming?
I wouldn't recommend the z510, battery life is terrible, it died after 3 months of normal use.
i have that one with fullhd resolution. well, you can play latest games on med-high graphics. some games not really smooth, but setting lower resolution helps (1650*1020 or whatever).
i have set my eyes on this new lenovo z510 which has the i5-4200m mentoned above, windows 8, 1tb hdd & 8gb ssd, geforce gt 740m 2gb ded. graphicsa and 6gb ram. jus wanted to know if this computer's processor is capable of playing next-gen anfd latest games
comments powered by Disqus