CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4500U vs 5757M

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark and GeekBench

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Value

Performance Per Dollar

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 4500U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4500U

Report a correction
Is hyperthreaded Yes vs No Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core
Newer manufacturing process 22 nms vs 32 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 41.6 pt/W vs 12.45 pt/W More than 3.2x better performance per watt
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,601 vs 1,095 More than 45% better PassMark (Single core) score
Lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 28.44W 2.3x lower typical power consumption
Slightly better 3DMark06 CPU score 3,494 vs 2,986 More than 15% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Slightly better geekbench (32-bit) score 4,839 vs 3,788 Around 30% better geekbench (32-bit) score
Lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 2.3x lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD A10 5757M

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 5757M

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 3 GHz More than 15% higher turbo clock speed
More l2 cache 4 MB vs 0.5 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Higher Maximum Operating Temperature 105 °C vs 100 °C 5% higher Maximum Operating Temperature

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 4500U vs A10 5757M

GeekBench (32-bit)

A10 5757M
3,788

GeekBench

A10 5757M
3,788

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

A10 5757M
2,986
On average I measured a 15% increase in the subset of game tests I was able to run in Taipei, and a 13% increase in performance across our 3DMark tests.
Core i7 4500U | by Anand-Lal-Shimpi (Jun, 2013)

Passmark

A10 5757M
3,142
PCMark 7 and single-threaded Cinebench show a 3 - 6% increase in performance, while multithreaded Cinebench and x264 show a 3 - 5% decrease in performance.
Core i7 4500U | by Anand-Lal-Shimpi (Jun, 2013)

Passmark (Single Core)

A10 5757M
1,095

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 4500U  vs
A10 5757M 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No
Is hyperthreaded Yes No

gpu

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4400 Radeon™ HD 8650G

details

Core i7 4500U  vs
A10 5757M 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nms 32 nms
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 105°C

power consumption

TDP 15W 35W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 41.6 pt/W 12.45 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 28.44W
Intel Core i7 4500U
Report a correction
AMD A10 5757M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus