CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4500U vs 5757M

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

Winner
Intel Core i7 4500U 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 4500U  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i7 4500U

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i7 4500U

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i7 4500U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4500U

Report a correction
Is hyperthreaded Yes vs No Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 720 MHz Around 55% better turbo clock speed
Significantly lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 28.44W 2.3x lower typical power consumption
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,596 vs 1,072 Around 50% better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better performance per watt 39.62 pt/W vs 11.9 pt/W More than 3.2x better performance per watt
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 4,802 vs 3,698 Around 30% better geekbench (32-bit) score
Better PassMark score 3,834 vs 3,103 Around 25% better PassMark score
Slightly better 3DMark06 CPU score 3,494 vs 2,986 More than 15% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 2.3x lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD A10 5757M

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 5757M

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 0.5 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 2.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 3 GHz More than 15% higher turbo clock speed
Much higher GPU clock speed 600 MHz vs 200 MHz 3x higher GPU clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Higher Maximum Operating Temperature 105 °C vs 100 °C 5% higher Maximum Operating Temperature

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 4500U vs A10 5757M

GeekBench (32-bit)

A10 5757M
3,698

GeekBench

A10 5757M
3,698

Passmark (Single Core)

A10 5757M
1,072

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i7 4500U  vs
A10 5757M 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No
Is hyperthreaded Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
XOP
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3L-1333
LPDDR3-1333
LPDDR3-1600

details

Core i7 4500U  vs
A10 5757M 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 105°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4400 Radeon™ HD 8650G
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 600 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz 720 MHz

power consumption

TDP 15W 35W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 39.62 pt/W 11.9 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 28.44W
Intel Core i7 4500U
Report a correction
AMD A10 5757M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus